Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
David Plaut: Off the Cuff

Sensitivity of Troponin Assays

Published April 17, 2014 1:50 PM by David Plaut

One of my concerns regarding the increased sensitivity of the available troponin  assays (both T and I) is the number of patients with measureable cTn with the newer methods. To a great extent, this concern has been alleviated by a recent study of several commercial assays in a 90 minute window. Of 465 ER patients, there were 12 AMIs. At presentation, the clinical sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 82% for hs-cTnI. The sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 82% for hs-cTnI at 90 min. A change of a 30% increase from baseline to 90 min improved the specificity to 94% without lowering the sensitivity. When AMI was defined as a 30% change of hs-cTnI at t=0 and 90 min and one hs-cTnI result >99th percentile cutoff, more than 3 times as many patients met the diagnostic criteria for AMI compared to results from the normal sensitive troponin assay; 28 hs-cTnI vs. 9 with cTnI. This data coincides with the concept that an AMI can be ruled in (or out) in a considerably shorter time than what many hospitals use today. While this may put a burden on the laboratory, it is a better protocol than a 6 hour version. And if the protocol uses no more than 2 samples in most of the cases (as this data argues), the laboratory and phlebotomists will have fewer samples to process.

posted by David Plaut


leave a comment

To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Enter the security code below:


About this Blog

Keep Me Updated

Recent Posts