<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BNP Testing and Clinical Outcomes</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/al_1/archive/2009/04/13/bnp-testing-and-clinical-outcomes.aspx</link><description>From Annals of Internal Medicine: At two Australian teaching hospital emergency departments, 612 consecutive patients who presented with acute severe shortness of breath were assigned through randomized numbers to receive BNP testing (n = 306) or no testing</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>re: BNP Testing and Clinical Outcomes</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/al_1/archive/2009/04/13/bnp-testing-and-clinical-outcomes.aspx#39511</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:48:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39511</guid><dc:creator>Bob Newberry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What are the advantages and disadvatges to performing Pro-BNP versus BNP?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>