<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Not Exactly a Ringing Endorsement for EHRs  </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/05/07/not-exactly-a-ringing-endorsement-for-ehrs.aspx</link><description>An emergency department (ED) in a facility in Western Sydney, Australia, banned the use of its EHR, going back to paper and pen, after struggling with downtime on the system. While a North South Wales (NSW) opposition health spokeswoman claimed that government</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>re: Not Exactly a Ringing Endorsement for EHRs  </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/05/07/not-exactly-a-ringing-endorsement-for-ehrs.aspx#38250</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:30:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:38250</guid><dc:creator>Lance Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't one of the first actions to take when implementing an EHR system is to ensure backups? &amp;nbsp;Whether it is another electronic system, record on paper and enter when the system is back or some other method, this sounds like very poor planning by the government. &amp;nbsp;And GOVERNMENT is who many people trust with their healthcare? &amp;nbsp;Sorry, that is for another discussion another time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>