<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ADVANCE Perspective: HIM : violation</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: violation</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>Privacy Problem Causes Real-Life Drama</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/21/privacy-problem-causes-real-life-drama.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:40010</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl McEvoy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/40010.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=40010</wfw:commentRss><description>There's been quite a buzz at ADVANCE headquarters about the television phenomena "Nurse Jackie" and "HawthoRNe." Staffers wonder: is it realistic , do nurses approve of the portrayal and--at least around the HIM desk--how many HIPAA violations can they...(&lt;a href="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/21/privacy-problem-causes-real-life-drama.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40010" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/Professional+Associations/default.aspx">Professional Associations</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/patient+privacy/default.aspx">patient privacy</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/privacy+violations/default.aspx">privacy violations</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/HIPAA/default.aspx">HIPAA</category></item><item><title>Investigators Probe Nuance</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/14/investigators-probe-nuance.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39806</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl McEvoy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/39806.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=39806</wfw:commentRss><description>Nuance Communications is under investigation for possible antitrust activity, according to Bloomberg.com . Investigators are trying to determine whether the company's acquisition of Phillips speech recognition (SR) software last year reduced competition...(&lt;a href="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/14/investigators-probe-nuance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39806" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/Health+Information+Technology/default.aspx">Health Information Technology</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/government/default.aspx">government</category></item><item><title>HIPAA be damned? </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/14/hipaa-be-damned.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39799</guid><dc:creator>Lynn Jusinski</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/39799.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=39799</wfw:commentRss><description>[Editor's note: This is a guest blog by ADVANCE for Nurses editor Lyn A.E. McCafferty, who contributes to the "ADVANCE Perspective: Nurses " blog featured on the ADVANCE for Nurses Web site.] If you think the fictional Nurse Jackie and HawthoRNe are bad...(&lt;a href="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/07/14/hipaa-be-damned.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39799" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/Health+News/default.aspx">Health News</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/patient+privacy/default.aspx">patient privacy</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/privacy+violations/default.aspx">privacy violations</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/medical+records+personal+health+information/default.aspx">medical records personal health information</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/medical+records/default.aspx">medical records</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/personal+health+information/default.aspx">personal health information</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/health+care/default.aspx">health care</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/patient+care/default.aspx">patient care</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/HIPAA/default.aspx">HIPAA</category></item><item><title>Malicious Use of PHI Lands Woman in Jail</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/06/11/malicious-use-of-phi-lands-woman-in-jail.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:38950</guid><dc:creator>Lynn Jusinski</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/38950.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=38950</wfw:commentRss><description>In a strange case of Internet harassment involving personal health information (PHI), a woman finds herself facing a year in prison for what a judge called "egregious" behavior, according to the Honolulu Advertiser. Rhonda Wong-Fernandez was sent immediately...(&lt;a href="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/06/11/malicious-use-of-phi-lands-woman-in-jail.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38950" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/HIM+in+the+News+/default.aspx">HIM in the News </category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/privacy+violations/default.aspx">privacy violations</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/personal+health+information/default.aspx">personal health information</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/Web+2.0/default.aspx">Web 2.0</category></item><item><title>Privacy Violation in NY</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2009/02/06/privacy-violation-in-ny.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:35520</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl McEvoy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/35520.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=35520</wfw:commentRss><description>A few months ago, reports of hospital employees snooping through celebrities medical records brought patient privacy issues to the foreground. But it's not just the rich and famous at risk. 
&lt;P&gt;A medical records employee at the Catskill Regional Medical Center in Harris, NY, was fired in November for inappropriately accessing records of acquiantances and co-workers. According to the &lt;I&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2009/February09/05/CRMC_breach-05Feb09.htm"&gt;Mid-Hudson News&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, the violation was discovered during a routine audit. Since then, the hospital has been closely monitoring all records and who accesses them. Patients who were affected by the violation were notified by letters, which were sent out Wednesday. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The former employee has not been charged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=35520" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/patient+privacy/default.aspx">patient privacy</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category></item><item><title>A Twist on Patient Privacy</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/2008/12/04/a-twist-on-patient-privacy.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:33581</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl McEvoy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/comments/33581.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/commentrss.aspx?PostID=33581</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Still recovering from Thanksgiving (and 2 nights of reenacting the feast, thanks to Tupperware and a microwave), I spent last Sunday morning lounging on the couch and watching the news. I usually zone out during the sports segment, but a story about Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress caught my attention. No game-saving play, no philanthropic Thanksgiving deed; instead, the man shot himself in the thigh-at a nightclub-on accident. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I shook my head and chalked the incident up as a (highly illegal) social faux pax that will likely be recounted on SportsNight and E!'s stupid celebrity moments. Why Burress had a gun and why the safety was off, I'll leave for the police to untangle. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But scan the &lt;A href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gbklAcCYPx4IxQzkeyTfINBHQtuwD94RPI4G0"&gt;news sites&lt;/A&gt; today and viola! The plot thickens. Investigators are looking into some questionable practices at the hospital where Burress was treated; namely, why the incident wasn't reported. Hospitals are required by law to report gun shot wounds to authorities, but this time, no notification was issued. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With UCLA Medical Center still embroiled in controversy surrounding patient privacy breaches-most recently, an employee pleaded guilty to selling Britney Spears' medical information to the &lt;I&gt;National Enquirer&lt;/I&gt;-it's not surprising that a facility would want to tip-toe around Burress' celeb status. But by keeping tight-lipped, doctors violated their legal obligation to report a gunshot wound. Countless hospitals have kept their mouths shut to protect celebrities in their care, but a hospital that actually breaks a law when doing so? That's newsworthy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps it was a no-win situation; alert the police (and, inevitably, every media outlet in the metro area) or keep Burress' treatment under wraps and hope authorities don't catch wind. No matter the facility's intentions, you have to give employees some credit for not blabbing as soon as Burress hopped on the examination table. But by failing to alert police, the facility still broke the law-and to protect someone who allegedly had a loaded gun in a public place, nonetheless. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Burress may be nursing his thigh for a while, but his doctors just shot themselves in the foot. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.advanceweb.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=33581" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/patient+privacy/default.aspx">patient privacy</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/lawsuits/default.aspx">lawsuits</category><category domain="http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hi_1/archive/tags/violation/default.aspx">violation</category></item></channel></rss>