Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
CIO Unplugged

Why Offshoring Works

Published February 11, 2008 1:53 PM by Edward Marx

The views and opinions expressed in this blog are mine personally, and are not necessarily representative of Texas Health Resources or its subsidiaries.

I feel fortunate to have relocated to a community with a thriving HIMSS chapter. Recently, I was honored to participate in a DFW-HIMSS luncheon meeting as a member of the CIO outsourcing perspectives panel. On the panel with me were two giants in the business, which enriched my experience. Rather than rehash what was said, none of which was particularly new, I want to give you a unique perspective on outsourcing. In particular, offshoring.

To lay a foundation for my perspective, I will acquaint you with my past experience. I had worked for years in a system where operations were entirely outsourced, and 25 percent of my staff was offshore. In other environments, I employed selective offshore sourcing for routine and project-based work. I have collaborated with top global sourcing firms. More recently, I visited India and toured the universities and factories of select firms. Perhaps the greatest insights gained however came from hosting dinner parties in my home for the rank-and-file offshore staff as they completed mandatory onsite rotations. Breaking bread at the dinner table created the single most effective time for listening. Why? When you minimize formalities and distractions, people tend to be more transparent.

As a general observation, offshore staff has provided a higher quality of service. Couple this with the price, and the value equation speaks for itself. Not only have I found this true with traditional offshore services, such as application support and interface development, but with our service desk as well. More important than reducing costs, our key service desk indicators improved, including overall customer satisfaction.

What was the key to this offshore success? Hunger.

From the analysts to the executives, my offshore staff had one thing in common. Hunger. Many of their American counterparts simply did not display the same intensity and desire. Yes, the offshore men and women were highly educated, but they also possessed an insatiable desire to further themselves through service and develop themselves professionally. The emphasis on quality and the execution of it proved far superior. While visiting some of the facilities, I sat back in amazement, asking myself, "What if we had this pervasive focus in America?" I had the offshore staff teach us continuous quality improvement and share their processes and best practices so we could adopt them locally.

In some cases, Americans have become complacent. We've taken for granted our prosperity and competitive position, and many have adopted an entitlement mentality. Rather than confronting the realities of the global economy and the increased competitiveness, we've rallied for protectionism and bantered "Buy American!" It wasn't always like this, of course. I believe the Greatest Generation had this hunger, which enabled us to reap the benefits. In order to sustain our prosperity and position, we must rediscover our hunger.

How do we develop that appetite? I am at my hungriest after a vigorous workout, after maximizing muscle hypertrophy and sweating off pounds. It is almost self-perpetuating: Work hard, build hunger, nourish and repeat. As leaders, we must develop and perpetuate this ethic within our organizations. We must ensure that support systems, like exercise equipment, are in place to cultivate hunger. Remove barriers and allow staff to perform at their best. Instead of relying on crude formulas based on education and length of employment, we must hire people with talent and attitude.

As we do this, the disparity between offshore and onshore will decrease, and we will find ourselves competitive again. Hunger will replace lethargy.

10 comments

At the end of the day its about performance.  Ed is right.  Wether offshore or nearshore or onshore, what have you done for me lately?  Execution will save America, not entitlements.

Jerry W, FInancial Services - Director February 25, 2008 10:25 PM
New York NY

"What was the key to this offshore success? Hunger."

This is a very simplistic if not elementary view of globabization.  I am sure that when you visited the facilities the workers put on an award winning performance.  In countries with the population above 1 billion, you are bound to find some favorable workers.  

Was this article actually written by a CIO and not a High School Football coach?

Ricardo M February 21, 2008 2:45 PM
Austin TX

My take away, for workers and leaders, is that we need to look at ourselves and make sure we are looking at our own performance and making sure we are providing value.  Thats it.    

Vicky Ryles February 21, 2008 10:27 AM
Springfield OH

While certain statements you make are questionable and/or objective (e.g. "higher quality of service"), I generally tend to agree that we the American I.T. workforce are not as "hungry" as the Indian I.T. workforce.  However, I think you fail to FULLY address the causes as I have often felt the root is certainly generational, educational, and leadership.

Yes, my Grandfather's generation knew well about hard work allowing you to advance - something Gen Y tends to forget - but let's not compare apples to oranges here.  Those were simpler times and the rules for this generation are completely different.  If you worked 12 hours a day back then, you were paid for 12 hours.  Now, 12 hours gets you yelled at because the company doesn't like to pay overtime - or, if you're salaried, 12 hours a day means nothing for you and more ROI for the company.  Back then, a Bachelor's degree actually meant something.  Back then, you could do your job well for 20+ years and get a gold watch at the end with your pension - "global economy" and "outsourcing" were not executive keywords yet.  What motivates us now?  What breaks our spirits?  Execs always playing the outsource card, watching our 401K tank, worrying about the next 2 years at a time.  The culture will worsen for our kids.  The "Greatest Generation" would not last a greatest friggin' minute in this un-even and shifting environment.  By the way, India is not cheap just because they have "hungry" workers - they are cheap because they have several millions of workers - there is no American generation that would be able to compete with those economies of scale.

Education has been the key to India's technological growth over the past decades.  They have a very large, younger generation right now and they were smart to invest highly in education.  What do we have here?  No child left behind.  Great!  My kid learns how to pass a basic skills test.  Where was the investment in education?!?  HP, Microsoft, and other major I.T. powerhouses are investing billions of dollars into India's future.  It would be nice to see someone actually give a damn about American schools that way.  I had a German exchange student stay with us one time - the only class that actually challenged him was Honors English!!  In this country we are so caught up with putting Creationism in Science classes and not requiring our kids to learn another language that we haven't even realized the rest of the world has moved on without us.  It doesn't get better, either.  Sure, companies promise Tuition reimbursement, but they'd like to persuade you toward a certain degree path - and I.T.??  HA!  Tell me, do you encourage your people (verbally or financially) to get advanced training and industry-recognized certifications that would help them?  Do you pay for those certifications?  I didn't think so.

No one area in American I.T. screams ineptitude more than leadership.  If you think your workers are not "hungry", then replace them with those that are!  To suggest that this is not possible is just nonsense.  There is plenty of talent that is being overlooked in I.T. today and, on the other hand, there is plenty of dead-weight that is overlooked as well.  Clean house!  Replace the poor performers, the prima donnas, and the people that can't work well on a team.  Pay your people appropriately, make them efficient, cross-train, stop the "silo" mentality - that sort-of insourcing is really overlooked in I.T.  In short, make your company efficient and you will all reap the benefits - OR, you can just take the lazy way out and outsource and see what you get.  Just don't be surprised if that trend gets carried away and you're replaced by that cheaper, younger, "more-forward-thinking" Indian CIO.

"Remove barriers and allow staff to perform at their best."  I really do love that sentence.  For, with the barrage of negatives hitting the American I.T. workforce these days it seems, we still have people that are hard-charging.  I just hope you take the time to see that - and more importantly, I hope you follow through with removing those barriers - whether they be HR, attitude, traditions, or whatever.  There is talent in America - it just needs to be nurtured and helped.  If your company decides to offshore the majority of its I.T. jobs, it will be because YOU failed them.

Jack, IT - GenX February 21, 2008 4:03 AM
Cubicle 5283941 TX

"I second that "The World is Flat" is a true and balanced analysis of the realities of Globilization. It cannot be ignored and it should compell Americans to step up to the table with a new sense of competitive fervor and innovative ideas. It is a fact and well documented that we have fallen behind the education curve  in the world.

Gary Claytor, Sourcing Advisory Services - Vice President, TBI, Inc February 21, 2008 12:11 AM
Denton TX

I support the authors thesis.  Read The World is Flat.  We need to reinvigorate passion in America.  The negative responses actually reenforce the authors point.  We have lost our way, other countries have exploited the opportunity and we need to fight back through the provision of value, not fear.

James Ramsey February 20, 2008 8:36 PM
Nashville TN

I think the main point is being missed.  Reality.  If we don't accept globalization and change the way in which we operate, offshoring will remain a threat.  Gartner estimates offshoring will grow 40% per year!  Hello.  According to the Census Bureau, 80% of net new American millionares are legal immigrants.  They were hungry.  They made things happen.  Think about it.  That is the imperative.  We need to change the way in which we have operated if we want a better future.

Reality February 20, 2008 11:20 AM
Denver CO

This is one of the most offensive articles I have ever read.  If American workers are so lethargic why is the United States ranked #1 by the World Bank as the country with the highest GDP.  That doesn't sound like a lethargy.

   For the last 100 years, the lethargic American has taken this country and raised it up to be the sole superpower in the world.  We have revolutionized medicine, technology, science, AND freedom.  If American's are lethargic, then the rest of the world must be comatose.

 You praise the workers from other countries that are "hungry".  China and India are 2 of the largest countries we outsource to.  Both countries are rampant with human rights abuses.  Both have a poverty level that is beyond anything we have here in the states.  These workers are cheaper because their quality of life is cheaper.  They don't have minimum wage, worker's compensation, or health insurance.  And if they do they can rarely afford it or choose to.  The American worker can't afford to compete with these people because our society wouldn't let us work for these wages.  If it did, we would be a 2nd world country like China and India.

   I think the biggest problem the lethargic American faces is corporate executives that only look at their bottom line and how they can cut costs to maintain their bottom line.  Not to mention that these same executive rarely know whats going on in the ranks below them.  They only know what their direct underlines report to them.  They make a decision and pat themselves on the back and move on to the next problem.  They rarely, if ever, realize the work that their underlings have to perform to get that decision done.

 But then again, this is just the ranting of the common lethargic american, who wouldn't know what to do or how to do it without the executives to tell me how to do my job.

Lethargic American Worker February 20, 2008 10:16 AM
TX

I find it interesting that "executives" have a view of American workers as "lethargic", especially considering the fact that American workers are among the most productive in the world.  What is also interesting to note is that as American productivity has increased over the last 7 years, median family incomes have fallen (and much more so, if you consider real inflation of 10%, not "core" inflation statistics based on phony CPI assumptions).  However, as the middle class has stagnated over the last 7 years, the top 1% have doubled or quadrupled in wealth.  So, Americans are working harder, making less, and the "executives" are making out like bandits.

So, please excuse me if I don't buy your Nordic Trac analogy which, if extrapolated to its logical conclusion, could be used as a rationalization for child labor or slavery.  Economic idealists often use the concept of "comparitive advantage" to rationalize offshoring.  But do you know what the "absolute advantage" is?   SLAVERY.  So, yes...I will concede the point that underpaid foreign slaves may be advantageous to greedy corporations.

Asinine and callous reasoning that rationalizes greed seems to be the best that "executives" can muster these days as they suck-up ever so obsequiously to their corporate masters, while giving the "lethargic" workers the shaft.  There is maximum theoretical output for employees....and that would be working as many hours a day that their physical and psychological health will allow.  Corporations would take 24 hours, 7 days a week at subsistent wages, if they could achieve it.  Again, a perfect definition of slavery.  Corporate "executives" seem to be driving workers as close to this threshold as possible.  Surely, there is a level of productivity that is "reasonable" relative to total slavery.

There are more important things in the world than work.  Things like family, children, communities, and nations.  And these things can be easily preserved with the current "lethargic" level of American worker productivity.  America is greater than these other nations to which we are now offshoring because of our commitment to law, morality, family, community, and nation (a commitment which seems to be going down the toilet).  Get off your executive high-horse.  You don't "own" your employees.  Corporations operate at the leisure of the public, not the other way around.  Corporations have a civic duty to help build sound societies.  Corporations are obligated to serve the public good while trying to make a profit.  But profit attained at the expense of destroing the middle class is de facto greed.  Corporations should not be so greedy.

Offshoring is a being driven quite literally by a mentality that wants to cash-in on the destruction of the American middle class.  This is why globalization is producing higher productivity, but lower incomes, while simultaneously, the top 1% "cash in" on it.  It centers on labor arbitrage as a vehicle to transfer middle class wealth to a plutocratic elite.

If for one, oppose it.  I'm all for capitalism, but not plutocracy.  We are the USA, not Mexico or India or China.  I can't believe you admire those nations and their workers over American.  How very UNAMERICAN of you!

Gene Mangrum, sofware development - senior software engineer February 16, 2008 5:39 PM
Hermitage TN

If CIOs and CEOs are interested in creating "hunger" in the U.S. they are doing a fine job of it.  Choosing between healthcare, the mortgage payment and food is a common reality.

Offshoring is not the culprit, the problem is excessive immigration.  While there are differing opinions on wage deflation caused by immigration -- housing inflation is undeniably running at a full blown 10% per year for the last 25 years.  

This inflation has not been primarily in the cost of the structure -- it has largely been in the cost of the dirt under the structure --  housing demand created by immigration policy that disregards job-growth.

These housing costs, push salary requirements beyond globally competitive levels, the working class, taxed at an all inclusive level of 40%, is concetrating on feeding her family instead of "process" and "innovation" at work.   The falling Dollar and inflation abroad will relieve some of this inflationary pressure, however the Fed must allow property values to adjust and mortgage insurers to fail.

The common misuse of L-1, H-1, H-2 visas and illegal immigration simply compound the housing inflation and promote offshoring at a rate that is faster than our economy can adapt.

It's too bad that CIOs don't hire people with enough "talent and attitude" to explain the dynamics of the race to the bottom and destruction of the consumer.  

When you cultivate hunger, you also cultivate instability.  The rule of law and common equity is the key to America's past successes -- not hunger.    

BTW: Nationalist / classist countries like India and China will hold industry hostage, once they own the mission-critical processes.  Tight credit will most likely prevent industry from moving to other labor arbitrage markets for the forseeable future.

weaver February 13, 2008 1:13 PM
Redondo Beach CA

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: