Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
ADVANCE Perspective: LTC

Guest Blog: EHR for LTC Providers

Published January 11, 2012 10:18 AM by Elizabeth Rosto Sitko
The following is a guest blog by Cynthia Morton, executive vice president of the National Association for the Support of Long-Term Care.:

Why has the long-term and post-acute care (LTPAC) market been slower than other providers to adopt and implement electronic health records (EHRs)? One reason is that, unlike most physicians and hospitals, long-term care providers do not qualify for the significant financial incentives offered through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) if they adopt certified EHRs that meet the meaningful use criteria of the Department of Health and Human Services. 

Nonetheless, we in the LTPAC community have other, equally compelling incentives to adopt EHR systems that can improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of care and also meet the increasing demand to share patient care information with other providers.  

Once we make the decision to convert our paper records into electronic ones, how can we be sure that our EHRs also will meet federal meaningful use criteria?  One way is to consider an EHR that is certified by the independent, not-for-profit Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®), which has developed the first EHR certification program specifically for the LTPAC market. 

The voluntary work group that developed the CCHIT Certified® program was co-chaired by the president of the National Association for the Support of Long-Term Care and included LTPAC providers and other clinicians, HIT developers and other industry stakeholders, and consumers. 

CCHIT Certified products meet and exceed federal requirements and CCHIT's core LTPAC certification is applicable to all LTPAC providers. There also are optional add-ons for skilled nursing facilities and home health.

What are the benefits?

If we choose wisely, EHRs can offer LTPAC providers a number of important benefits, including: 

  • Easier access to patient diagnostic, treatment and demographic information
  • Automated alerts that allow staff to respond quickly to changes in a patient's condition
  • Time savings in documenting care, obtaining patient records, processing physician orders and reading care givers' notes
  • Greater ease in tracking quality indicators
  • Improved documentation that may support higher research utilization groups (RUGs) and increase reimbursement.
  • More rapid information exchange that can improve diagnosis and treatment, enhance coordination of care and streamline transactions with payers

What to look for in an EHR.

The basic qualities to assess when choosing an EHR are: 

  • Functionality - what the product "does," such as the ability to create and manage electronic records for all your patients, as well as automate the workflow in your facility.
  • Interoperability - how the product exchanges information with other products, such as the IT systems of physicians and hospitals.
  • Security - the product's ability to protect your patients' privacy and provide secure and easy access for authorized providers.

Preparing for the future.

Interoperability between your EHR and those of other providers is particularly important as we prepare for the new health care system that is rapidly becoming a reality in the U.S. - one where care is integrated, coordinated and seamless.  We must have the tools needed to share information with physicians, hospitals and other LTPAC providers and to participate in partnerships with hospitals, accountable care organizations and health information exchanges. 

While there are many EHRs on the market from which to choose, it's important that we choose wisely.  The systems we invest in should be tested and certified against industry and government standards and support the needs of our patients, both now and in the future. 

Whatever products we choose, it can take up to a year to research and fully implement an EHR system.  The time to get started is now. 

 

1 comments

I am reading your raitcle and the statement of  potentially harmful unintended consequences” that result from the stimulus legislation’s EHR incentives  and I find this is another big joke. The more I read about the private sector and government EHR debates, the sicker I get. More discussions, experts opinions, more certifications and now hybrids EMRs. Clearly there is no leadership. Interesting is the fact that I rarely see physician's input at all in all these discussions. As a private practitoner and an EMR user I foresee the future.  More of the same stuff we are plagued with now; lack of a standard, rising costs, multiple vendors who want their product to succeed, intercompatibility issues, poor technical support, company mergers, increasing maintenance fees every year, more nonsense government regulation, the vendors efforts to succeed and sell their product. After three years using an EMR at my office I do not see any of the benefit that so much is being talk about, except for legible notes. It is clear EMR is a big capital investment that given the way medical care is reimbursed in this country, most of physicians can not afford. We have seen extremely slow adoption and never a convincing economic justification. Yes, a lot about unfulfilled promises like Medicare payment incentives for e-prescribing.The issue at hand is simple, we want a cost effective product that works. It is clear a functional practical system does not have to have all the bells and whistles, fancy colors or graphics. Proposals I never listen are; Why not to expand the VA or Armed Forces system to the civilian population? We already paid for the cost of development. Also, why not look at other countries like France and Great Britain and learn from their successes. Their cost was not 20 billion dollars as our great Obama has proposed to give away to our private sector. It is obvious that those in power in America love to give money to their friends in the industry. Clearly, the beneficiaries will be those who support political candidates, hardware and software companies, lobbyists, trade associations and not the patients and health care practitioners.  It is time to find a solution, satisfy the needs of the health care providers and put aside the intention of those who expect to become millionaires with EMR technology.

Mary Mary, ehTJintJpGEoA - kecPmfRWDyaK, qOnaFCphbRoyElJdMLb March 20, 2012 1:52 AM
LbPwCTkndEvSWdcQ OR

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below:
 

Search

About this Blog

Keep Me Updated