Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
ADVANCE Outlook: Lab Professionals

"Octomom" Sparks Action

Published March 6, 2009 10:54 AM by Kerri Penno

In the past few weeks, media coverage and public opinion has surrounded Nadya Suleman, who recently gave birth to octuplets, bringing her brood to a whopping 14 children.

While the celebrity gossip magazines have focused on Suleman's family's disapproval, past 911 calls and resemblance to Angelina Jolie, the fertility industry has honed in on the fact that Suleman's 14 children, including the octuplets, were conceived through in vitro fertilization.  

According to the Center for Genetics and Society (CGS), Suleman's fertility doctor violated industry guidelines regarding how many embryos that should be transferred at a time. Limiting the number of embryos implanted during IVF is just one of many ethical issues surrounding the assisted reproduction industry.

In June, I wrote an article about donor-conceived children, in which Wendy Kramer, executive director and founder of The Donor Sibling Registry, lamented the lack of federal governance over sperm banks.

In the U.S., guidelines, established by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, are not federally mandated and violators are not effectively sanctioned.

Now, in the wake of Suleman's story and the "designer baby" controversy (another leading fertility specialist has begun advertising genetic selection for physical attributes like hair and eye color), the CGS is calling for Congressional hearings to institute federal governance over the industry.

"We need carefully crafted policies that don't infringe on reproductive rights, and that bring responsible regulation to the baby business," said Marcy Darnovsky, CGS associate executive director.

1 comments

This entire episode raises huge ethical issues. The media has concentrated on the salacious details, but I am more concerned with the ethics of the situation.

Bill Clinton, once explained his Lewinsky dalliances by saying "I think I did it simply because I could."  Should we as a society explore science to the degree that we pursue every technique to its ultimate end? Should we do something simply because we can?

I still have a million questions about the validity of informed consent given by this woman and the motivation of the doctor performing the procedure.

This case sets some bad precedence and also has societal consequences way beyond that of one woman and her children.

Autonomy (the right of self determination) is a fundamental ethical principle. Ethically people have a right to make choices about their own bodies and their own healthcare. But when the effects of one's actions materially spills over on to others, the ethical obligations are quite different.

Glen McDaniel March 6, 2009 3:42 PM
Atlanta GA

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below:
 

Search

About this Blog

Keep Me Updated

Recent Posts