Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
Stepwise Success

Questions and Answers

Published June 15, 2009 6:02 AM by Scott Warner

Your workplace may have a buddy system to bond new hires with your organization. That's great for trivial questions about the lunch menu, where to park, or who handles payroll. But what about tough questions? For example:

Why do I work more weekends than other techs?

In an open environment, this question is asked to and answered by the supervisor who creates the schedule. Or (even better) a transparent process makes the answer obvious. The question may be asked at a department meeting and answered without a defensive attitude. And if there really isn't a good answer, a productive discussion follows that finds a solution.

What happens when we respond to being written up?

In a productive, quality-oriented environment, a write-up is focused on the facts of the event itself without jumping to a root-cause analysis i.e. The lab tech made a mistake. The incident report follows a consistent path to gather information from accountable parties to a point where a root cause analysis is done. Uncritical discussion without assumption of negligence follows to find a solution.

But this doesn't happen everywhere. I think it's a safe bet that in some workplaces employees are punished with the schedule and laboratories are punished with incident reports. Questions are ignored until they disappear or are replaced by easier ones. Regardless of what leaders claim for a culture, no response is a powerful answer: shut up, don't ask again, we don't care what you think, find another job if you don't like it. Employees who give voice to this silence are labeled as having "perceptions" – code for "instigator" – and leave or are marginalized. Horrible!

Answers, of course, depend on accountability. Those who are answerable not only need to give answers, they need to foster an environment that makes it possible for answers (and questions) to change, thus generating excitement and not suspicion, appreciation and not contempt, teamwork and not bullying.

Ask the tough questions, and listen for the answers. One way or the other, you'll hear them.

3 comments

Although I also work nights, I'm lucky to work with a great laboratory director and immediate supervisor (the Blood Bank technical specialist) who let me know that I am appreciated and communicate with me in person as well as via e-mail.  I realize that this type of work atmosphere which prioritizes open communication of everyone's ideas (including the new people) cannot be taken for granted.  Also, unless someone calls in sick, I am informed on reasonably advance notice by my supervisor about having to work unscheduled shifts; in fact, she called me yesterday about working 3rd shift on Tuesday night of next week (when my "seven on" was originally scheduled to begin on Thursday night).

You see, I have previously worked for a couple of other hospital laboratories with "sorry" negative managers who only paid attention to employees who did things they didn't like (i.e. listen to the radio in the lab, inadvertently call the wrong doctor who hated to be awakened early on a Saturday morning with a "critical" MRSA report on a patient, etc.)

The previous commenter is absolutely right about bad bosses exacerbating our serious staffing shortage when rumors about their behavior discourage prospective Generation Y employees from applying because these younger people won't take their "blame and shame" morale-killing BS.

About the AMT vs. ASCP dilemma, the problem is that our field has so darn many different letters/agencies associated with it that HR departments at various hospitals aren't aware of all of them - and mistakenly believe that ASCP is the only "valid" certification for laboratory position applicants.  I wonder how many people out there believe that h*ll will freeze over before the clinical laboratory profession actually becomes unified under ONE certification, obviating the need for expensive state licensure and all the current confusion.  Don't get me started on that...

Stephanie L. Mathis, MT(ASCP), Generalist - Clinical Laboratory Scientist, Danville Regional Medical Center June 27, 2009 12:34 PM
Danville VA

I was given a crappy night shift schedule that the supervisor took it upon herself to change numerous times for me only after it was posted and had me working nights every weekend.  I saw the writing on the wall and skipped out.  she and the others there obviously were in their own clique and I didn't fit in.  I can say I didn't much like them either.  The feeling was mutual.  Glad that I left.

On a different note..  I think that managers and supervisors love communicating with the stafff that they don't see on a daily basis by email.  This gives them the opportunity to not have face-to-face confrontations or have to give tough answers to staff members in person.  In fact, reading and >ignoring<  email is the easy cop-out taken by many.  Yes - many do.

Or it is easier to skirt around the question posed by either

   (a) answering with another vague question or

   (b) answering with an answer that is verbose and content-less or

   (c) deferring it to a later date and time or delegating it to another person that has no idea what is going on nor really cares.

MY POINT BEING >>  old farts in leadership should look to change their ways of thinking as newer generations are coming up through that won't stand for the status quo, nor will they file in line and take a canned response for an answer.  Yes, they will question it and NO they shouldn't be looked down upon as "instigators"  this ambition should be fostered as a sign of new leadership - something yesterday's laboratories need.

Anonymous Technologist, , MT any lab June 22, 2009 10:35 AM
Anytown

Why is that I have seen some disparity between the MT, AMT versus MT, ASCP.  I have the requirement to take the ASCP Certification but I decided to take the AMT instead. I am a Certified Medical Technologist , AMT and I read some stories people talking not to good about AMT. As far as I am concerned I am as good as any ASCP MT ( I work side by side with them in my job and we treat each other with respect and as professionals as we can be), however when I look some vacancies they specify ASCP Certification.  If both certifications required: first to have the credential on education and/or experience and take a national standardized test, why so much discrepancy?  

Wilfredo Cardona, Generalist - Medical Technologist, Potomac Hospital June 16, 2009 8:08 PM
Woodbridge VA

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: