Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
Stepwise Success

The Right Specimen

Published June 19, 2009 6:09 AM by Scott Warner

The New York Times reports that a laboratory sent letters to nearly a thousand patients for redraws after six patient samples on six specific days in a nine-month period were discovered as mislabeled. A hospital spokesman describes them as "isolated incidents," although he points out that medical errors are a widespread problem.

Most patients have no idea what happens to a blood sample after it's drawn. Neither do we, when a sample is sent to a referral laboratory. But all laboratories have rigorous identification and labeling standards that are religiously followed at the time of draw. Laboratories treat errors seriously and deviations as near misses. It's part of the culture.

It can be a challenge to get non-laboratory professionals to appreciate the value of these standards. Specimens dropped off may be unlabeled, labeled for the wrong patient, or labeled with incorrect information i.e. wrong culture site. It can be frustrating for the doctor or nurse to hear a specimen will be rejected when they may have just been at the patient's bedside. What's the big deal? I know my patient. Your laboratory may have variations on this policy to account for unique situations.

We can imagine how these errors happen. Patient wristbands are not checked before collection or are absent. Specimens are pre-labeled, handed off, dropped off, or stuck in pockets. Specimens from different patients are labeled at the same time. A common root cause is not immediately labeling a specimen in the presence of the patient.

A strict rejection policy enforces compliance but may not fix root causes. The laboratory can train collectors, draft policies, educate staff, and directly observe performance. Cheat sheets and posters that show what to draw and how to label are helpful tools. And monitoring and reporting errors to a hospital quality improvement committee can show how these initiatives succeed.

To a patient, the lab not having the right specimen is frightening. It frightens us, too.

2 comments

Ryan,

I too worry about the errors we don't catch.  And I'm amazed at anger over a rejection of an unlabeled specimen, when the reaction should be, "How did that happen and how can we fix it?"  Surely, obvious errors imply undetectable errors.

I think there's a tendency to assume we all have the same standards.  Thus, while the lab finds it unacceptable to mislabel any samples, another department may assume its unsatisfactory performance is average and conclude the laboratory must be hiding its own errors.  One silo may not fix an obviously broken process in which specimens are not labeled in front of the patient, because it doesn't believe it can be fixed even in the face of clear evidence.  Or there may be an attempt to make a painfully simple process i.e. putting a sticker on a tube in front of a patient much more complicated than it really is to explain away errors.

The least rational argument, probably, is that analyzing an unlabeled or mislabeled specimen saves the patient a stick.  It's hard to believe any healthcare professional would think this way, but the arrogance of work silos can lead to all sorts of bizarre behavior.

A hospital-wide identification policy can make sure standards really are the same.  The laboratory can offer to directly observe another department's process, which can help break down silos.  And those doing the labeling can talk to each other without management present.  Simply rejecting mislabeled specimens doesn't fix it, really.

Scott Warner June 25, 2009 4:37 AM

The scary thing, in addition to the ones that are caught, are the ones that AREN'T caught!!  

I wonder how many go by each day from outpatient sites, nurse draws, nursing home draws, phleb draws and especially ED draws that are mislabeled that we don't catch because they may not flag, delta check or cross our benches as 'suspicious'.  

Do the people that take lax standards when dealing with patient samples understand the implications that this can have on the people behind the sample they are (mis)labeling? ...  or do they just not care and only want results to give the practitioner?  

I know it angers those that get called on the carpet when they do not follow laboratory guidelines for specimen collection and handling, BUT those guidelines are obviously there for a reason -to protect the patient.

Ryan June 22, 2009 10:04 AM
Buffalo NY

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: