Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
New Grad NP

Differing Diagnoses

Published August 9, 2012 12:49 PM by Samantha Damren

In the last month and a half I have met and treated two women, both newly diagnosed with HIV and previously unaware and unsuspecting of their corresponding diagnoses. In both cases the women contracted it from their former husbands. I say former because one of the men died approximately one month before his wife, patient #1, learned of her diagnosis. My other patient, patient #2, was divorced and remarried; her current husband is HIV negative. At the time of diagnosis, each patient had a CD4 count of less than 20 copies/mL, and each presented with an AIDS related illness.

Despite their similar diagnostic presentations, their responses were diametrically opposed. Although patient #1 was overflowing with anger towards her newly deceased husband, she embraced, as best one could in such a situation, this new reality and was eager to begin treatment and therapy. Patient #2 left the hospital AMA only to return about 24 hours later due to compounding complications associated with her AIDS related illness. Due to the precarious state of her health, avoiding treatment was no longer an option. Nonetheless patient #2's husband had to convince and coax his wife to return to the hospital for treatment.

Over the next two weeks, while patient #2 remained in the hospital, I had to routinely remind her that maintaining her appointment with her ID specialist upon discharge from the hospital was paramount. At one level I understand that returning to the routine exercises of her life outside of the hospital shielded her from the ambiguities and uncertainties of her new diagnosis. However, as a clinical optimist, I found her lack of engagement frustrating because an HIV diagnosis is not a death sentence, unless a patient fails to comply with their medication regimen.

Now I know tomes have been written analyzing the psychology of diagnosis and disease. I don't claim to contribute any pithy additions. I recognize that some patients need time to process the totality of their diagnosis, however in the case of patient #2, time was not on her side. I have found, in no uncertain terms, that candor and consistency, rather than dogmatism and sternness, are assistive approaches to acknowledging and treating disease.


1 comments

This is the worst, poorest grammatically written article i have ever read.

Sally Bannerwell, FNP August 10, 2012 12:10 AM
San Francisco CA

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below:
 

Search

About this Blog

Keep Me Updated