Evidence-based practice
In the last few years, the occupational therapy profession has made large and purposeful strides towards becoming evidence-based. We have known all along that what we do works. However, we don't have very much scientific, quantifiable evidence to back it up. As a result, students like me find themselves barraged with evidence-based assignments - and oftentimes, there isn't yet any evidence to report on!
I don't mind research, as long as the topic interests me. However, not so long ago I found myself doing a paper on handwriting interventions, which didn't interest me in the least, solely because there were evidence-based articles written on the topic. Other people found themselves in the same boat, writing papers on alternative seating in the classroom just because there was actually some research to be found on that. While it was a good experience and the articles were mildly interesting, it certainly didn't spur my desire to do more research.
Isn't there a better way to do this?
Here's an idea for a project. Someone research why students don't like research! I'm certain the answers would be enlightening. While it's true that there will always just be some people who detest the slow, scientific process of research, I think the way it is being thrown at us chases some people, those who are on the fence, away.
OTs are creative. So let's figure out a way to make backing up our profession with statistics FUN. If they can make watching bacteria grow in a Petri dish interesting, studying OT interventions should be absolutely enthralling. Right?