Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
ADVANCE Blog for PAs

Independent Practice for Vermont Nurse Practitioners

Published August 14, 2008 6:25 PM by Stephen Cornell

From ADVANCE for Nurse Practitioners, word that Vermont NPs could soon be practicing independently.

A rules and regulations change that could be completed soon in Vermont would provide independent practice status to NPs and increase patients' access to primary care.

In the state's 2007 legislative session, the Vermont Nurse Practitioners Association (VNPA) provided testimony to the House and Senate health committees for the purpose of educating and advocating for NPs. Based on the testimony, the Legislature passed Act 71, which will help ensure health care reform. One section of the act called for a study of whether the collaborative practice requirement for NP practice should continue. The law noted that NPs "might serve a greater role as primary care providers who provide essential chronic care management."

A multidisciplinary task force made several recommendations to the Vermont Board of Nursing (BON) after the act was passed. These included recommendations to eliminate the requirement for NPs to have a written signed collaborative agreement with a physician, to require an NP appointee to the BON and to create a mentor-mentee program for new graduate NPs.

Jennifer Laurent, NP, president of the VNPA, told ADVANCE that the House Health Committee endorsed the recommendations. "The House Health Committee sent a letter to the BON asking them to expeditiously move forward with removing the [requirement for a] practice agreement," she said. A majority of the task force agreed that the collaborative practice requirement should be ended.

After these recommendations were made, Laurent met with Mary Botter, executive director of the Vermont BON, to discuss removing the collaborative practice requirement. Botter requested that an NP advisory group be formed to make recommendations to the BON as to how the change would occur. The BON would then accept or reject the advisory board's recommendations, then present final recommendations to a professional operations committee.

In addition to seeking comments on collaborative practice, the advisory board will continue to meet to provide guidance on NP issues in Vermont and to make comments on all changes recommended by the task force, including practice by new graduate nurse practitioners. The advisory board will address whether new graduates will be able to automatically practice or must first complete an internship.

"Because the climate is really hot right now, and the primary care shortage is all over the papers and all over Congress, [Botter] and VNPA agree that we need to move. People have had enough of not being able to get care," Laurent said.

The NP profession has never been afraid of a fight, and nurse practitioners have made extraordinary strides over the last decade.

Link

5 comments

Much agreed about Fredrick leaving a nasty comment! Has he ever noticed that nurses have been rated by patients to be much more trust worthy than physicians. If nurses wanted to micro-manage patients and practice just medicine, we would have choosen medical school, but considering we love to practice nursing at an advanced level, we choose NP school instead! NP's are just as capable as physicians to provide thorough quailty healthcare with a true wholistic approach. I wonder how Fredrick is going to feel when NP's are going to be DNP's?! Cheers to nursing!

Alexis Dudunake, medicine - RN December 1, 2008 9:46 AM
Boston MA

Excuse my enthusiasm!  I inadertently said when referring to independent practice "the majority of states" That is not correct. More correct to say "many"  If one were to include APRN's in general ,the statement would be more correct.  Psych CNS's have been independent in majority of states for years. In CA, as a CNS, I practiced independently. As a NP, I moved to Oregon and now feel like I can be a much more valuable contributor-- to be able to do therapy and prescribe independently! Love my job!

Satu Woodland September 26, 2008 1:40 PM
Bend OR

Wow! What a nasty comment from Frederick! You do not sound happy! Frederick, NP's have been around for a lot longer than PA's have been around. You guys are a new phenomenon! The majority of states already have independent practice for NP's.  Some for many years. I have been independent in Oregon for 4 years (PMHNP) and I have many many patients who prefer to see NP's over MD's. The outcome studies of NP's are excellent. We are not mini doctors and I and my patient's prefer my more holistic practice over a MD. Many types of medical professions have independent practice, ie. PT, OT, Nutritionists, etc.. We are another type-- but gladly and proudly not MD's!

Satu Woodland September 26, 2008 1:10 PM
Bend OR

Just wanted to add a note to say that there is no filter for comments to this blog. I can take down posts if I find them inappropriate. But in the eight months since this blog began taking comments, I have only removed spam postings and one particularly nasty post that included a personal insult.

Stephen Cornell August 26, 2008 7:22 PM

I wrote once before and was never published and I doubt if I will be again since I am totally against any NP getting independent practice status.  Already jobs for PAs are being lost in major California cities due to the independent status of NPs  More and more hospitals like the idea due to costs and more PAs are being squeezed out of the market.  The same is happening in Washington state.  Why should a physician have to supervise a PA when they can have a NP with lower costs (and sometimes, lower care status).  Vermont is just another state where money talks and nurses have a strong foothold or stranglehold on healthcare.  If they wanted to be physicians, why did they not go to medical school!

frederick reaves, occupational medicine - physician specialist, remote site August 26, 2008 6:41 PM
buckeye AZ

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: