Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
ADVANCE Blog for PAs

Physician Assistants in Canada: A 'New Breed' With An Old Name

Published October 29, 2008 2:50 PM by Stephen Cornell

The Kingston Whig Standard newspaper touts Canadian physician assistants as "a new breed of health professional."

Two long-term care facilities, one in the downtown, the other in Kingston's west end, have gone from rags to riches in the last few months, thanks to some exciting "out of the box" thinking by the medical profession, university educators and the health ministry.

Doctors specializing in family medicine at Queen's University are spending four-month rotations at Providence Manor, where they give one-on-one care to residents under the supervision of the manor's on-site physician. At Trillium Centre on Edgar Street, two "physician assistants," a new breed of health professional being introduced in Ontario, are spending five days a week attending to the medical needs of residents. The PAs are also supervised by the centre's physicians.

One question: didn't anyone tell PA pioneers in Canada, Australia and other countries experimenting with the PA concept not to use the word assistant? Even many staunch opponents of a name change for the PA profession in the United States concede that assistant is an innacurate and misleading word and was an unfortunate early choice for the profession's name.

The word assistant results in encourages assumptions such as this:

Nurse practitioners are a close cousin of physician assistants but have more independence. They can hang out their own shingle if they want to, though most work in teams. By comparison, everything a physician assistant does must be approved by a doctor.

Of course mere assistants must have physicians looking over their shoulders approving everything they do.

Why are the new breeds of PAs making the same old mistake?

2 comments

I am at the Family Practice PA meeting for a few days.

We have been talking about the name and most agree it is a huge problem.

Here is the issue, all other assistants, let me say it again, all other assistants in the world are not expected to know what the people they assist know. We are. None can diagnose legally, none can prescribe legally. None. None. Nada.

So when you are an assistant who does what the person you assist does, it becomes confusing. When you are assistant who can be a professor at a medical school OR wins the title of "Flight Surgeon of the Year" or owns and runs your own clinic it makes your name an obstacle in having people understand what and who you are and what exactly you do. It is innaccurate and fools the consumer.

The AAPA should defer any PR campaign until it hires a research firm to come up with what the best name for our profession would be going forward. If not, people will think medical assistants can now prescribe and even be more confused.

Dave

DAve Mittman October 30, 2008 1:39 AM
Livingston NJ

Yes the name could be improved upon, but it is impossible to overcome 40 years of American Cultural bombardment. Do you think you could market a whole profession and health provider from the start?  In Ontario, under the current law, Physicians must approval either beforehand in Delegated Acts or on-site PA actions.  What the article fails to mention is that Advance Practice Nurses are very limited in what they can actually do as "independent" as almost all work in teams with Physicians.  Which is why the proven concept of Physician Assistants is much easier to explain.

Ian, Neurosurgery - PA-C / CA cert, HSC October 29, 2008 9:54 PM
Winnipeg IT

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: