Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
ADVANCE Blog for PAs

Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants and Primary Care

Published March 11, 2009 5:06 PM by Stephen Cornell

There seems to be a bit of a stink about the new American College of Physicians policy monograph about nurse practitioners in primary care.

Overall, the conclusions seem pretty tame. The ACP acknowledges the NP role in primary care, but believes that NPs should work in collaboration with physicians as part of a team.

NPs, of course, won't like the opposition to independent practice, but the ACP seems willing to grant NPs a substantial role in providing primary care in the United States.

Here's the monograph's conclusion:

The future of health care delivery will require multidisciplinary teams of health care professionals that collaborate to provide patient-centered care. The key to high performance in multidisciplinary teams is an understanding of the distinctive roles, skills, and values of all team members. Just as the ACP celebrates the special attributes and capabilities of advanced practice nurses, it recognizes the unique role that a personal physician plays in patient care. Advanced practice nursing should not substitute for nor replace primary care medical practice as provided by general internists, family physicians, and other physicians. Physicians and NPs not only share a commitment to providing high-quality care, but also face similar challenges regarding reimbursement and workforce outlook. Recognizing and building on the common ground between the two professions is vital to improving collaboration to meet the complex health care needs of the population.

Pretty tame stuff.

The PA uproar seems to center around the fact that the ACP did not write a similar monograph about PAs. The problem with that is, PAs haven't given the ACP a reason to write such a monograph.

The NP profession has been and remains aggressive in trying to expand its role in medicine. That kind of aggressiveness demands a response.

The official PA attitude has been, "We're OK with whatever the physicians decide." While that doesn't alienate physicians, it doesn't provide cause for any kind of response.

PAs and NPs are different beasts with two different approaches. NPs are the squeaky wheel, so to speak. PAs prefer not to draw too much physician attention.

At least that's my take.

Click here for the entire ACP policy monograph.

3 comments

Full Disclosure: I am one of the staff authors of the ACP policy paper on NPs.

ACP is very supportive of Physician Assistants. In fact, PAs are the only non-physician clinicians that can be affiliate members of ACP.  However, the ACP policy committee responsible for the NP paper made a strategic decision to create a separate policy paper about NPs because many of the issues are unique to that profession.  There was no intent to ignore our PA colleagues.

ACP and AAPA will be discussing issues of common interest over the next few months and we look forward to greater collaboration between our professions and professional societies.

Michael Barr, VP, Practice Advocacy & Improvement March 16, 2009 10:05 AM
Washington DC

I work with several PAs who know just as much, if not more, than I do. I don't understand why you all aren't pushing for more independence as well. Start being the squeaky wheel too..

Jennifer Scott ARNP, FNP-BC, ARNP March 12, 2009 8:09 PM
FL

I think the "stink" comes merely the lack of mention which from a PR point of view leaves PA's sort of out of the discussion (as far as people who STILL do not know what we do). The discussion should include all mid-level clinicians,practitioners,etc . For those of us who are old enough to remember the adversarial "nurse wars" of the late 70's and 80's when we had to fight to be heard , it feels a bit like "old times". I just returned from practicing as a PA in the UK and with four new PA programs there, it's been very interesting to see how NP's and practice nurses deal with the advancement of this new category of clinician.  Also, with the Obama administration poised to expand medical coverage in  a cost effective manner,we should be in all discussions involving potential roles for mid level practitioners. Otherwise,all primary care jobs will be sucked up by NPs who can be more affordable because they do not require any physician oversight ( something I consider potentially dangerous,but appealing to insurers). obviously those of us in surgical sub specialties,etc would not be quite as negatively affected.  On the West coast a significantly goring number of primary care positions are requesting applications from NPs only.

Roberta Rich March 12, 2009 6:22 PM

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: