Specialty Certification: Do Not Be Afraid
Editor's Note: Below is a blog post from Michael C. Doll, MPAS, PA-C, DFAAPA, FAPACVS, president of APACVS, on the subject of PA specialty certification. Check back each Monday for a new post, and please feel free to leave comments. If you would like to contribute a blog entry, e-mail assistant editor Heather Simons at hsimons@advanceweb.com. Thanks.
Since the NCCPA issued its news blast on August 11, 2009, several conversations have taken place about the new voluntary specialty certification process. Many PAs have expressed fears that certification may become mandatory in order to work in specialty practice.
First of all, let me remind you that for years the NCCPA issued an elective recertification surgery exam that was separate from the core recertification exam. I took the surgery exam twice and nobody (i.e. hospital credentialing department) ever asked me if I was certified to do surgery.
Having said that, times are different and some of my fellow PAs are now being asked the question, "What allows you to do surgery?" Case in point: a well-seasoned California-based cardiac surgery PA relocated to another state. His initial attempts to achieve hospital-based privileges at his new job were denied until he could present documentation of competency to assist in surgery and perform bedside procedures. Just saying, "Well, I've done it for years" was simply not sufficient. A letter of support from his supervising physician did not assist him in his pursuit of obtaining privileges. The documents that this PA eventually presented to his hospital credentialing committee were a procedure log, attendance of procedure-based training courses and fellowship status within his subspecialty.
Fortunately, this issue of PAs having trouble obtaining privileges is not commonplace, but it is occurring with more frequency. The Joint Commission, State Boards of Medicine and credentialing committees are becoming more focused on clinicians proving competency. Therefore, PAs will need a way to show some element of competency or ability to do surgery (or ER, or dermatology, or even psychiatry).
In addition, over the last couple years, groups not part of the NCCPA have attempted-and failed-to format specialty boards for PAs. I believe that the NCCPA started to feel external pressure to develop a specialty certification process.
I applaud and totally support the NCCPA's effort to "dip their toe in the water" by coming up with a recertification process that meets more of the diverse subspecialty needs within our profession, both medical and surgical. The analogy that I have used for years with regards to the recertification process is that the NCCPA only put out one antibiotic (meaning one recertification test) that all patients (PAs) were required to take.
But, as with medication use, not all persons can take the same medication. I believe this is true for the current singular recertification process. Will the NCCPA dive deeper into this subject in the future? That remains to be seen. In the meantime, do not be afraid to jump into this new, but still voluntary, recertification process.
Michael C. Doll, MPAS, PA-C, DFAAPA, FAPACVS
President APACVS