Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
PA Specialty Certification

A Letter to the NCCPA

Published October 12, 2009 10:29 AM by Heather Simons

In a letter to editor Michael Gerchufsky, Todd Bruce, PA-C, FAPACVS, writes that he is "very concerned about the path the NCCPA is taking our profession down." In response, Bruce sent a letter to the NCCPA, voicing his concerns about PA specialty certification. "I hope that it is not too late to reverse this dangerous process," he says. Below is a copy of the letter Bruce sent to the NCCPA.

To whom it may concern,

I am deeply concerned about the path the NCCPA has decided to travel regarding specialty certification. As a PA for over 14 years, working in both primary care and a specialty, I feel that this decision has drastically changed our profession and eliminated our biggest advantage: our flexibility.

I completely understand, and agree with, the need to be able to document our training, skill and expertise in a given specialty. However, this certification process will at the same time create the precedent for limiting movement between specialties.

First, you state that this is a "voluntary" process. (This is) true in that you still require the PA-C as the primary certification. But what employer, given the choice between someone with specialty certification and someone without, is going to consider the person without the certification? Therefore, in order to compete for a job, it would not be "voluntary;" I would be forced to obtain this certification.

Secondly, you state that in order to prevent this from being a barrier to entry into a specialty you only have to complete one of the four requirements to consider yourself a "candidate" for specialty certification. I must disagree. This will be a barrier as three out of the four requirements require you to have a job in the specialty. A case log and years of experience obviously require a job in the specialty. While it is possible to obtain specialty CME while not working in the field, it is unlikely to be funded by your employer. Finally, if you take and pass the specialty exam without working in the field, what does the exam validate?

What the NCCPA has done is double my certification requirements. Now I will have to take and re-take two certifying exams, with double the fees and new CME requirements.

Let me give you some perspective on myself and why I feel this way. I graduated from SUNY Stony Brook in 1995 and entered family practice. I would make the argument that if this is the path we are taking, specialty certification, then family medicine should also be treated as a specialty. We all know that after PA school we have a background but are nowhere near proficient in medicine. It takes several years of on-the-job training in family medicine and a mentor before we are proficient. What, then, is the difference between that and any other sub specialty? After eight years of family medicine, when I changed to cardiothoracic surgery, the same rules applied. I had a good background of information, and it took on-the-job training and a mentor to make me proficient.

I would also point out that it is my primary care training and background in family medicine that make me a good cardiothoracic PA. It is my ability to treat the whole patient-not just their heart-that makes me a valuable member of our team. I believe this holds true in any specialty, and any PA who doesn't recognize or value that primary care training is not someone who I would want taking care of me or my family.

I believe there are other models, such as the Fellow designation, that allow PAs the ability to document their experience and expertise in a specialty, without creating a barrier or increased certification burden. I would strongly encourage the NCCPA to reconsider this process.

I believe my years as a PA in both primary care and cardiothoracic surgery give me a unique perspective on this issue. If I can be of any assistance to the NCCPA, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your support of the PA profession and for your time in listening to my opinion.

Professionally, 

Todd Bruce, PA-C, FAPACVS

Greeley, Colorado

Editor's Note: This is a guest blog post on the subject of PA specialty certification. Check back each Monday for a new post, and please feel free to leave comments. If you would like to contribute a blog entry, e-mail assistant editor Heather Simons at hsimons@advanceweb.com. Thanks.

6 comments

Kudos to the PAs who have voiced their opinions!  I agree wholeheartedly to all the posts.  Passing re-cert every 6 yrs and making sure that there was enough CMEs I & II every 2 yrs were stress enough already, in addition to our busy job everyday.  Now with worrying about "specialty certification" is an unnecessary burden on our lives.   I really do not understand why NCCPA decided to try that route, and very disappointed!  

Hanh-tien Tran, Primary Care - PA-C October 30, 2009 1:13 PM
Fairfax VA

I wholeheartedly agree with these cogent comments and would suggest the only way to get the NCCPA to listen to the Profession and to the Professional organization that represents them is for PAs to Boycott any specialty exams. Unfortunately there are those who will take the exams, setting us on a path that we will regret, and feeding into NCCPA that they do not need to be accountable to PAs and to the Profession when it speaks. I only hope that the number of PAs who do sit for the exam will be insufficient to support the process, and it will die an unceremonious death. Then those who wasted their money on the Certification will see the error of their ways.

If the Profession does not support specialty Certification, having no one register for the exams would let the NCCPA know that they had mis-spent their time and money. Economics talks, and economics is the only driving force behind the plan, so hitting them in the pocketbook is the only effective way to get their attention.

James Frick, PM & R - Physician Assistant, Munson Hospital October 19, 2009 12:42 PM
Traverse City MI

I'm so happy to see that there are still PA's out there with some sense of what a PA should be...To spend one's career concerned with how many Certifications one can achieve is a bit egocentric. All of those Certs look great but what do they accomplish except pumping iron into oneself and one's ego...because..."NOBODY CARES"  . If you're the patient , you just want someone that cares about your problems......When we start making everyone care more about initials and tests we've taken as opposed to what kind of person we have become...THEN , my friends ...we got a Problem "right here in River City" , With a capital "P" that rhymes with "Me".......By the way...I use P.A.I.E.S. after my name...."Physician Assistant In Every Specialty". I've been told that the more initials and Certifications you put on a P.A. resume the better it sinks to the bottom of the trash can....My Chief of Surgery had a 35 page resume...She was an MD ..I'll bet they didn't toss hers...but then we will not be interviewing to be the Chief Of Surgery in a world renowned  Cancer Center will we?

Ben P.A.I.E.S. October 16, 2009 11:55 AM

I am in complete agreement with the comments Mr. Bruce makes in  his excellant commentary.  NCCPA has established it self as a national regulator of the PA profession.  Their reputation with Medical Boards and the Federation of State Medical Boards is stellar.  No one can criticise their accomplishments in administrating a national entry level examination that has excellant statitics of reliability and validitiy.  They provide a service to protect the public from unqualified practitioners and have achieved the premier status of an outstanding testing agency.  

When it comes to providing specialty certification, the NCCPA has fallen short. Their actions to recognize a specialty PA by bestowing a certificate attesting to the PA's specialty competence will be misunderstood by those who control PA practice arrangements.  The gold standard that the entry level certificate now has will be tranfered to this new specialty certificatant.  When one studys the qualifications to sit for an untested specialty certification exam, one must be amused, if not embarassed by what the NCCPA defines as being specialty certified. There is no way one would be considered specialty qualified by passing an examination.  You can not call yourself specialty certified without advance study, formal post-graduate experience that is accredited and overseen by specialty certified mentors.

Unfortuanately individuals in power positions will accept the NCCPA Specialty Certification as the gold standard and equally as important as the entry level certification process, making it a mandatory requirement for future PAs who would like to enter a PA specialty or primary care discipline for that matter.  

If you were an ED director who wanted to employ a PA for his busy emergency department, would you not want to have an Emergency Medicine certified PA?  Do you think a candidate for an emergency medicine position who did not possess this specialty certification would have a chance to be chosen for this ED position? Do you not think third party payors are not going to take notice of this "Specialty Certification" to decide that a non-certified specialty PA will not qualify for reimbursement? Or, the federal government when it comes to Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement for physician services that are rendered by a PA?

I have a serious problems, as other PAs do, with what the NCCPA has launched for 2011. The fall out will not be felt for some time, but when it does, it will change our beloved profession forever and most importantly not for the right reasons.

Glen Combs, Psychiatry - PA, Piedmont Psychiaric Associates October 13, 2009 10:42 AM
Kernersville NC

I agree with David and Bruce.

We are of so much value in specialities BECAUSE our background is primary care and we can see the trees in the forest unlike some very specialized MDs!!! We come from a DIFFERENT background than the MDs and DOs and that is the real value of our profession. Don't fix what isn't broken, we got enough of that in Health Care already!

b.

Birgitta, Pediatrics - PA-C October 12, 2009 2:29 PM
Bend OR

I agree with Mr Bruce regarding his concern of specialty certification.

I spent 6 yrs in primary care and the past 10 yrs in Otolaryngology. One of the benefits of being a PA is our flexibility to move between specialties. This certification would limit this flexibility and would make it virtually impossible to enter a new field without having specialty training. No specialist would hire a PA without this certification. So how would a PA transition into specialty care? The next logical step in this process would be a specialty residency program. With all this extra certification, why not just go to medical school? The apprentice-like process I went through with my ENT mentor was comprehensive and has real value. I've been hired by two other ENT practices since without hesitation. It took just a few minutes of discussion for them to realize that I had been trained and that I  did  have expertise in our area of practice. If the process isn't broken, why "fix" it?

David Ericson, Otolaryngology - PA October 12, 2009 2:17 PM
Cherry Hill NJ

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: