A Cynical Viewpoint From A Long-Time PA
Editor's Note: Below is a blog post from Paul S. Fogel, DPM, PA-C, on the subject of PA specialty certification. Check back each Monday for a new post, and please feel free to leave comments. If you would like to contribute a blog entry, e-mail assistant editor Heather Simons at hsimons@advanceweb.com. Thanks.
After reading editor Michael Gerchufsky's editorial on specialty certification, I feel compelled to introduce to the discussion the cynical viewpoint of a recently retired PA. I hope you find the humor in all of this, as I have. It is laughable, to say the least.
A graduate of Long Island University/Brooklyn Hospital, I have worked as a PA since 1973. Back then we had great ideas and predicted a great future for medicine. I soon found out that was a joke. No one knew what to do with a PA. Others weren't even sure what I was there for. I worked in the ICU, with the crash team, did autopsies, started IVs, took H&Ps, administered shots and IV drugs, performed CPR, and fixed air conditioners, beds and cardiac monitors. I also scrubbed in for surgery as first assistant, handled post-op care, and scrubbed in as an assistant for eye, oral, general, rectal and podiatric surgery.
Back then NCCPA did not exist. I worked for a couple of years in a dead-end PA job--at the time, PAs made no more than $15,000 annually, and usually less-and later elected to go to podiatry school. In 1973, it seems that only two out of 10 people understood the role of the PA. Now maybe three out of 10 people know. Great marketing. If Wal-Mart was that good, they'd have been out of business years ago.
I was certified in 1973 but did not renew my license after I started practicing as a podiatrist. After 15 very difficult years trying to build a private practice, I quit podiatry. Medical malpractice insurance and finances were the problem. I had no rich relatives and did not want loans to persist for what I considered a profession in which I was a loser. Because I could, I re-established myself as a PA. I had to re-take the PANCE. The first two times I failed the physical exam portion. I was told to retake that portion and try it again from the viewpoint of a student, not a clinician. Finally, on the third try, I passed. The following year they dropped the physical portion from the exam.
Meanwhile I had, at extra cost, passed the "specialty" boards that were offered at that time in surgery and medicine. Joyfully, I considered a bright future. I found a great position in oncology in 1996. The next time I was up for NCCPA certification, I found that they now considered those specialty boards I had taken unacceptable. What a joke. What a waste of time studying and extra money for the exams.
I am retired now and also recently re-certified, so I will never have to be re-certified again, as I have no plans to practice here in Pennsylvania, where malpractice insurance is the highest in the nation. There are 10 PA programs in my area that offer master's degrees, and there are very few jobs available other than the usual burnout CT surgery and orthopedics. Maybe you can explain why I had PAs with their master's degrees working as surgical house PAs doing resident scut work. They had to tolerate terrible hours, call, animosity and low pay, while NPs were working in teams with the docs and making $80,000 or more fresh out of a two-year program.
I think the NCCPA is made up of a bunch of money-grabbing slugs that think they are some real HOT stuff. It seems many of its directors have never worked as a PA in the field. Some will object to this observation, but I think that PAs have been sold out by legislators like the NCCPA, AAPA, and all of those who have helped perpetuate the myth that NPs work hand-in-hand with PAs to improve health care in the nation. What a bunch of propaganda and crap. NPs have slowly moved themselves into a position of power where they are assuming the role as primary care providers. I once had an NP as an oncology patient. She insisted on telling me how much more qualified and knowledgeable NPs are than PAs, all while I was taking her history.
I predicted the downfall of podiatric surgery years ago, knowing that the economy would drive the orthopods to take foot surgery back, and I predict that NPs will begin seeing patients on their own nationally and sending their harder cases and questions to the remaining physicians and specialists who, hopefully, will have PAs working with them. I wish you and your colleagues luck. I don't think all the "specialty" designations will do a damn bit of good.
Keep pushing for PhDs for PAs and see how many enemies you can make. Many nurses have PhDs. Are they going to start hiring PAs to do their clinical work while they sit on the phone giving NURSING advice to families?
Will PAs with PhDs have their own offices? Will they be instructors for master's programs? Are they able to do more clinically? Will they command more money? If so, to do what, exactly? Certainly not what PAs were created for at Duke.
I think specialty boards represent another way for the ailing NCCPA to pick up a few bucks and drain PAs of whatever money they break their backs to make. After they get as many PAs as they can convinced or scared enough to take those tests, they'll discontinue the specialty certification process after a while. That is, until the next regime comes in and thinks of another cool marketing scheme. Geez, get me a T-shirt for that.
Can you tell me who will decide if the specialty certificate means anything to a prospective employer? Most will not even know what it means or even care. Some of the PAs are so out of touch with reality. It reminds me of how surgical residents acted and thought of the profession. After they got out into practice, real life was a rude awakening. Not all podiatrists would be doing the heart surgeries they did as residents and helpers.
Pennsylvania was one of the first states that accepted PAs, and I still have to explain what a PA is to patients and folks I meet. How come everyone knows what an NP is? CVS has Minute Clinics, and they will not hire PAs because we need a physician supervisor. That might change when the NPs lobby to allow NPs to supervise PAs.
I'm glad I'm out and wish you all the best. Sorry you got the short end of the stick. Is there specialty certification for that?
Respectfully and sadly submitted,
Paul S. Fogel, DPM, PA-C
D.O.P.E. (Doctor Of Practically Everything), M.O.N. (Master of Nothing)