Only two holdout states remain in the APTA's decades-long effort to allow patients to directly access the treatment of a physical therapist without physician referral. As of this writing, only Oklahoma and Michigan prohibit direct access to physical therapist treatment on any level, according to the APTA.
In Michigan, efforts are heating up. Senate Bill 690 was introduced on Nov. 14 by Sen. John Moolenaar (Midland) and lobbying is now underway in the state legislature to "remove any unnecessary barriers to safe and cost-effective physical therapy services," according to the Michigan Physical Therapy Association.
MPTA has assembled a Direct Consumer Access Portal with tips and tools for contacting state legislators, including a pre-loaded message to send to representatives that the sender can edit as they like. With just a couple of clicks, physical therapists, patients, family members and friends can demonstrate their support of the bill.
View the tool as well as background information on the issue at the MPTA website.
Opponents of direct access for physical therapists frequently cite the issue of patient risk as a reason to deny it. Yet according to the APTA, no state that has enacted a direct consumer access law has ever repealed it.
Three days before the legislation was introduced, ADVANCE published an in-depth examination of the question of direct access and patient risk. Check it out here.
And please encourage your friends, co-workers and family members in the Wolverine State to show their support of SB690. Let's get the number of holdouts down to one. You're next, Oklahoma.
I did it. On Sept. 15, I attempted and completed my first-ever 13.1-mile race -- the Philadelphia Rock ‘n' Roll Half-Marathon. Although I've been running since I was 13, this particular accomplishment meant a lot to me because my ability to run has been hampered for about 15 years by recurring iliotibial (IT) band tendonitis in my right knee.
I wrote a guest blog post for Philly.com last week about the origins of my injury and how I've tried to manage it. In a nutshell, for most of the past 15 years my efforts to combat the inflammation have consisted of rest, ice, protective knee straps, Ibuprofen, not running on consecutive days and generally limiting myself to about 3 miles when I did run. That was all well and good if the only races I ever wanted to run were 5Ks. But over the past couple years, I became determined to push my limits and stop letting my knee hold me back.
So after doing some research, I incorporated two new key elements into my training. The first was a shortened stride, because I read that keeping it more underneath my center of gravity would decrease stress on my knee and help soften stride impact. The second was regularly using a foam roller to loosen up my hamstrings, quads and IT bands.
Armed with these supplemental tactics, I've been gradually increasing my training mileage and race distances since the spring of 2012. I capped off last year's running season in November with an 8.4-mile loop race along the Schuylkill River in Philadelphia, the first time I had run that far since high school. Then I challenged myself early this running season by taking on a 10-mile race in ADVANCE's hometown, King of Prussia, PA. But all the while, I knew my ultimate goal was to complete a half-marathon -- and that judgment day finally arrived this week.
So how did it go? Well, I can truly say it was the most physically grueling challenge I've ever faced. But not because of my knee, which held up great. The course was beautiful and the weather perfect (about 60 degrees with clear skies). Music bands and cheer squads along the way definitely helped keep me going.
My goal was to not only finish the half-marathon, but run it at 8-minute-mile pace. I actually impressed myself with how consistent a pace I was able to keep -- almost exactly 8 minutes a mile for each of the first 11 miles. At that point, I found myself staring at 2 miles to go and about 30 seconds overall ahead of goal pace. Mentally I felt very good about the position I had put myself in. Physically, I felt like every muscle in my legs was about to seize up. "Just hold on!" I told myself. "You can do it. You don't have to run any faster -- just maintain." Easier said than done, but I willed myself forward.
By the 13-mile mark, I knew I had lost some seconds and it would come down to the wire whether I reached my time goal or not. So I steeled myself to give every last bit of energy I had for the final 0.1 miles, which turned out to be... uphill. My legs felt like lead weights but I forced them to surge ahead and actually started passing other competitors in the straightaway. As the end loomed, I coaxed one last burst of speed out of my spent body and shot through the finish line. Struggling to walk on wobbly legs in the post-race area, I felt overwhelming relief and satisfaction from having passed such a daunting test.
But did I reach my time goal? I wasn't sure -- and actually thought I might have missed it by a few seconds. Later that day, I pulled out my smartphone and went to the race website in search of posted results. To run at exactly 8-minute-mile pace or better, I needed to finish with a time of 1 hour, 44 minutes and 52 seconds. So I inputted my name, took a deep breath and hoped for the best. My time? 1:44:51! Incredibly, over the course of 13.1094 miles, I had beaten my goal by a single, solitary second. It was an amazing cap to what I already felt was a terrific accomplishment.
Who knows if I'll ever run another half-marathon again? But finishing this one, especially considering the challenges I had to overcome to even reach the starting line, has to rank as one of the greatest moments of my life.
On Aug. 1, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) introduced the "Promoting Integrity in Medicare Act," according to a press release from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Alexandria, VA. This measure seeks to remove physical therapy and other healthcare services from the in-office ancillary services (IOAS) exception from the federal Stark laws, also commonly known as self-referral. If enacted, it would effectively eliminate financial incentives from the physician-referral process. The APTA and its partners in the Alliance for Integrity in Medicare, or AIM Coalition, strongly support this move to exclude these services from the IOAS exception.
The self-referral law generally prohibits physicians from referring Medicare patients to entities in which they have a financial interest. It seeks to ensure medical decisions are made in the best interest of the patient on the basis of quality, diagnostic capability, turnaround time, and cost without consideration of any financial gain that could be realized by the referring physician. Originally intended for same-day services such as X-rays and blood draws, the IOAS exception allows physicians to bill the Medicare program for procedures that are meant to be integral to the physician's services and offered for patient convenience.
"Unfortunately, using the exception in a manner not originally intended provides physicians with incentive to refer patients for services that may not always be necessary or typically provided on the same day of an office visit," the press release continued. "This not only increases utilization of services but also Medicare costs. Physical therapy services clearly do not meet the intent of the exception and self-referral by physicians has the potential to increase costs. Physicians and physical therapists have a longstanding professional relationship that serves patients well without the need for adverse financial ties or relationships."
The argument over physician-owned physical therapy services (POPTS) has raged in the profession for years now. This latest development is certainly a boost to the cause of those who oppose POPTS. On which side of the issue do you stand? What do you believe the future holds for POPTS?
Last week's PT 2013 conference in Salt Lake City offered what has become an annual institution -- the 44th Mary McMillan Lecture. Promoting the theme "The Next Evolution," this presentation featured honorary speaker Roger Nelson, PT, PhD, FAPTA. Currently vice president of expert clinical benchmarks at MedRisk Inc., based in King of Prussia, PA, Nelson is also professor emeritus at Lebanon Valley College in Annville, PA, and a former professor at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. Overall, Nelson has served the profession of physical therapy and APTA for more than 45 years, including 25 years as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Public Health Service.
ADVANCE sat down with Nelson after the presentation for a short interview about the message he sought to convey as McMillan lecturer.
"I saw it as a daunting challenge, and I wanted to offer a message that would resonate with attendees," he said. "So I emphasized how we as a profession need to evolve, in terms of research, education and practice. That includes identifying the value of physical therapy, emphasizing the role of data collection and analysis, while also understanding the importance of cost efficiency. Practices must act as businesses."
So did he believe that the presentation went well?
"Yes, and that was very important to me. I spent the past 14 months preparing and I tried to offer a cogent set of points that combined to present a vision for the future. In general, I think we need to ensure that PT isn't known as a 'commodity.' For example, in conversation people will say they have an appointment with their doctor or their dentist. But they usually don't say they have an appointment with their physical therapist. Instead they say a 'physical therapy appointment.' We need to develop the concept that we're a profession, not a commodity. Although progress has been slow in that aspect, I think we're making headway."
SALT LAKE CITY -- For the first time ever, the APTA has brought its Annual Conference and Exposition to Utah, and ADVANCE is here to cover all the action. Coincidentally, this is also my first trip to Utah, and specifically Salt Lake City. For those wondering what the place is like, here's a quick rundown. The scenery is beautiful -- Salt Lake City sits in a valley surrounded by towering mountains. It's also hot. Real hot. The temperature is expected to reach triple digits all four days of the conference. But as they say, it's a dry heat -- and noticeably different from the muggy mid-Atlantic summers I'm used to. Finally, there's a very laid-back vibe to the whole town -- with friendly residents and quiet streets.
Last night's opening ceremonies though were certainly not laid-back. The APTA made a concerted effort to deviate from its traditional format of a succession of podium speakers comprising a lengthy lead-in to the keynote speaker. This year's ceremonies, modeled after the increasingly popular TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Talks, featured APTA board members and Utah chapter representatives addressing the audience in quick bursts from the front of the stage. This presentation combined with short pre-taped segments to put an emphasis on fun and entertainment. Keynote speaker Dave Barry then took the stage and drew many laughs throughout his irreverent 45-minute presentation. A well-known humor columnist and author, his work has been syndicated in more than 500 newspapers in the United States and abroad. Barry began by joking how little he actually knew about physical therapy.
"In fact," he said, "you might even get a couple CE credits deducted because you attended this speech."
The Miami-based humorist related tales about the hazards posed by hurricane season in Florida (which "lasts from June until about the following June") as well as the dangers presented by having so many retirees living in the area. He also touched on his own status as an aging Baby Boomer and later brought the house down with his thoughts on the difficulties men and women face in relating to each other. Tongue planted firmly in check, he concluded, "So those are my thoughts on the challenges facing physical therapists in the 21st century," and left the stage to a rousing ovation.
It was a great start to what all attendees hope will be a fun and informative conference. Are you in town for PT 2013 too? Feel free to leave some comments below about your thoughts on the conference so far.
With temperatures soaring well into the triple digits this week (and a potential to break the all-time record high this weekend), NATA President Jim Thornton, MA, ATC, PES, kicked off the 64th Annual Meeting and Clinical Symposia of the National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) the morning of June 25 by moderating a press event to release the association's new Best Practice Guidelines for preventing sudden death in secondary school athletes.
Announcing "significantly record-breaking" conference attendance numbers upward of 15,000 -- which shattered previous numbers in St. Louis and New Orleans the last two years -- Thornton reported that the new guidelines will be published in the July issue of Athletic Training, the association's professional journal.
"This is the most important moment for me professionally," said task force chair Doug Casa, PhD, ATC, FACSM, FNATA, chief operating officer of the Korey Stringer Institute (KSI) and director of athletic training education at the University of Connecticut. The recommendations serve as a roadmap for policy consideration regarding the safety of secondary school athletes. They address the leading causes of sudden death in this population -- head and neck injuries, exertional heat stroke, sudden cardiac arrest and exertional sickling.
LaQuan Phillips, a local football player who sustained a spinal contusion during a 2008 game and who became partially paralyzed from the injury, was on hand to help introduce the new guidelines. Phillips, who was injured as a senior linebacker for Green Valley (Las Vegas) High School, credits the school district's athletic trainer Jeremy Haas for saving his life, keeping him calm during the event and preventing further damage. Phillips underwent surgery and nine months of rehabilitation, and walked at his own graduation the following June.
"That was a very humbling, very gratifying moment," Phillips told the audience.
The full guidelines can be viewed here.
The NATA conference is taking place this week at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center in Las Vegas the week of June 24-27. Stay tuned to updates and comprehensive coverage from ADVANCE!
Two weeks from today, the APTA's annual conference & exposition will kick off, making its first-ever appearance in the state of Utah. From June 26-29, PT 2013 is scheduled to convene in beautiful Salt Lake City. The exclusive ADVANCE preview article detailing city attractions and conference highlights can be found here.
According to Curtis Jolley, PT, MOMT, president of the Utah Physical Therapy Association, "The conference will come at a beautiful time of year here. There could still be a little snow on top of the mountains. It's only about a half-hour drive from downtown to famous ski resorts like Park City and Snowbird. For any attendees who come from parts of the country that don't really have mountains, I definitely recommend going up there to see how pretty it is."
Salt Lake City has much to offer beyond the natural scenery as well.
"There are all kinds of wonderful restaurants downtown, including a section called Trolley Square, which is a gathering of shops and places to eat," Jolley added. "A huge new indoor/outdoor mall called City Creek Center also just opened. There's been a great resurgence in the downtown area over the past few years, including enhanced mass transit. A light rail line now runs from the airport straight downtown, so conference attendees who fly in can just take the train to within a block or so of the convention center. We're excited to showcase Utah along with its physical therapy profession and we encourage people to come here and enjoy our state,"
Will you be attending the conference? Have you ever been to Salt Lake City before? What are you most looking forward to about it?
The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Alexandria, VA, announced in an April 30 press release that Indiana Gov. Mike Pence has signed HB 1034, granting Hoosiers direct access to evaluation and treatment by a physical therapist without a physician referral. Ensuring a patient's choice of which healthcare professional to see and when has been a longtime goal of the APTA and its state chapters.
Passage of this bill signifies a landmark moment for the profession in that all 50 states and the District of Columbia now allow patients to be evaluated by a physical therapist without a referral. With enactment of HB 1034, 48 states and DC also allow some level of treatment by a PT without a referral. The new law takes effect July 1.
"We are thrilled that Indiana has become the latest state to offer patients the choice of direct access to physical therapist services. Ensuring patient access is a cornerstone of APTA's vision and mission," said APTA President Paul A. Rockar Jr., PT, DPT, MS. "I congratulate our colleagues in the Indiana Chapter for their resilience and dedication in enacting this vital legislation after many years of tough battle. I also want to thank Rep. David Frizzell for authoring the bill and Sen. Patricia Miller for sponsoring the bill in the Senate."
The bill, which was promoted by the Indiana Chapter of APTA, permits patients to be evaluated and treated by a physical therapist for 24 calendar days without a referral from a physician or other provider. However, referrals will continue to be required for spinal manipulation and sharp debridement. After 24 days, the PT must obtain a referral from another, authorized provider to continue treatment. Prior to passage of the new law, a referral was required for all physical therapist services, both evaluation and treatment.
As APTA celebrates this legislative success in Indiana, it will continue to work toward improved patient access across the country. While all states now allow patients to be evaluated by a physical therapist without a referral, there are still significant restrictions in many states that continue to impede patient access to physical therapist services. Only 17 states currently enjoy unrestricted patient direct access.
"We'd like to see unrestricted patient access to physical therapists in all 50 states," Rockar said. "Unrestricted patient access is considered the 'gold standard' for patient care as it does not include arbitrary restrictions, such as time or visit limits."
What do you think about this milestone and the APTA's mission to pursue unrestricted direct access in every state? How has direct access impacted your practice?
Are you looking for an opportune time to volunteer overseas? Judging from the number of reports I receive from ADVANCE readers, and from organizations who are continually looking for therapists to join their travel groups, the demand-and desire-for lending a PT hand in parts unknown is growing. Some recent reports:
Michael Tabasko, PT, MSPT, OCS, has been active with HVO since 2006 and has volunteered in Vietnam, Peru and Bhutan. He is currently practicing at Capitol Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation in Rockville, MD.
In "Why We Volunteer," published this month in ADVANCE, Michael wrote: "My assignment through Health Volunteers Overseas (HVO) in Thimphu, Bhutan, focused on teaching physiotherapy technician students, as well as educating and consulting with my local counterparts. We met some wonderful people along the way too, but I wanted to know that my donated time was successful, that it was worth something tangible.
"We're told the value lies in acknowledging your privileged position in this world by helping a less-privileged one. It's supposed to make you feel good--better, in fact, than if you'd been compensated to do it. Whether it's a weekend helping out in a rough neighborhood or an overseas commitment, at some point all volunteers question how much their presence has actually mattered... Maybe specific outcomes have very little to do with the individual's impact, and the real result is the experience itself, a simple interaction and greater understanding amongst cultures."
I was also recently contacted by Chandi Edmonds, DPT, who presented to a group on training she did in Port au Prince, Haiti several months ago. As a volunteer with Project Medishare, Edmonds trained local physical therapy techs to work with patients, many still suffering with injuries from the 2010 earthquake. Edmonds reported that the nation's only critical care hospital is inadequately staffed and supplied. The facility is small and treatment areas and patients are exposed to sometimes harsh elements.
In her two weeks there, Edmonds witnessed the indomitable spirit of the proud Haitian people, as well as the abject need that resulted in children dying. Chandi plans to continue promoting awareness of Project MediShare and the vast need in Haiti.
Therapy Volunteers Needed in Haiti
And more recently, this request from Donna Hutchinson, PT, co-founder of Global Therapy Group: "We are a 501c3 non-profit, all volunteer organization providing therapy services in the Port au Prince area. We are in need of PT, OT, and ST volunteers for 2013 and wondered if you might assist us in getting the word out?
"Global Therapy Group is seeking physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy volunteers at our clinic in Port au Prince, Haiti, for rotations of two weeks or longer. Global Therapy Group was created in 2010 to bring sustainable rehabilitation services, therapy education, and employment opportunities to Haiti following the earthquake. Our clinic is staffed with a Haitian clinic manager, a Haitian rehab tech, and PT, OT and ST volunteers from around the world. Our patient population includes children and adults, orthopedics, cerebrovascular accidents, developmental disabilities, trauma and injuries. We arrange for guest housing, transportation and all in-country support."
If you are interested, contact Donna at firstname.lastname@example.org or visit http://www.globaltherapygroup.org/ for more information. Photos courtesy of Chandi Edmonds, DPT.
The American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, put out a press release yesterday detailing the role that therapy professionals and students played in helping victims of the tragic bombing at the Boston Marathon. The release stated:
"A team of 70 members of APTA's Massachusetts Chapter, stationed at the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15 when tragedy struck, stepped in despite a chaotic scene to help injured people. These volunteers, led by Dave Nolan, PT, DPT, OSC, consisted of physical therapists and physical therapist students from Northern University, Simmons College, and Boston University. Nolan said, ‘All are physically OK but are certainly dealing with tremendous emotional challenges right now. I am proud of how each member reacted in the face of catastrophe to provide exceptional care for the critically injured.'
Massachusetts Chapter President George Coggeshall, PT, DPT, reported that no APTA members who were runners, spectators, or volunteers were hurt in the blast; however, there are members whose family and loved ones were among the more than 170 injured people. Coggeshall expressed sincere thanks to those who aided the victims and everyone who reached out to the Massachusetts Chapter. ‘Thank you for your many emails and calls expressing your concerns, caring, compassion and love,' Coggeshall said. ‘We will do our best to follow the footsteps of those chapters who have survived adversity and tragedy.'
If you are interested in helping people affected by this tragic event, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick and Boston Mayor Tom Menino have announced the formation of The One Fund Boston."
How have you been impacted by this shocking attack at one of America's greatest community events? Do you have any suggestions about other ways that PT professionals can help?
Last month, my mom, who is 67, had surgery on a torn meniscus in her right knee. She's not even sure how she tore her meniscus, and it was a very light tear; could have been something as simple as planting her foot wrong or her foot coming lose from her shoe, causing the twist. I wouldn't consider her particularly "active;" she has a full-time desk job but does walk for about 20 minutes a day at lunch when weather permits.
Before her surgery, I did some investigating on whether surgery was necessary, and what she could expect to be able to do once her treatment was complete. I asked her if her doctor had suggested physical therapy as an option, rather than the surgery. She was told the surgery, done in an outpatient office, was very non-invasive and with some rest and proper pampering of her knee, she'd be fine in a few weeks. And she now is, having recently returned to work. Other than the exercises she was told to do every day after she got home, she was told post-op physical therapy would not be needed.
It turned out that her surgeon removed some arthritic cartilage too, so perhaps the surgical intervention was the best option, in her case. But it did make me wonder if physical therapy was even put forth as a viable alternative to having the surgery. Perhaps the doctor took a look at the tear and decided surgery would be minimal enough to go right to the source. And when my mother first experienced the tear, she was in a great deal of pain; at the outset the combination of the tear and arthritis formed in the knee made walking near to impossible.
New research from Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), suggests that physical therapy may prove just as effective as surgery for some patients. These findings were presented this month at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Researchers at seven major universities and orthopedic surgery centers around the U.S. assigned 351 people with arthritis and meniscus tears to get either surgery or physical therapy. The therapy was nine sessions on average plus exercises to do at home, which experts say is key to success.
After six months, both groups had similar rates of functional improvement. Pain scores also were similar.
Thirty percent of patients assigned to physical therapy wound up having surgery before the six months was up, often because they felt therapy wasn't helping them. Yet they ended up the same as those who got surgery right away, as well as the rest of the physical therapy group who stuck with it and averted an operation. The research was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.
Should my mom have been encouraged to opt for physical therapy rather than the surgery? It might have saved her time off from work, but would it have prolonged her pain when walking? Can patients assume doctors do consider PT as an option, but decide on a patient-by-patient basis who needs surgery and who can heal just as well without it? I'd be interested to know what readers think.
Last month saw a unique occurrence for ADVANCE. In an effort to highlight interdisciplinary collaboration, we scheduled a staff-written article to be the cover story of two different publications, ADVANCE for Occupational Therapy Practitioners (Feb. 4) and ADVANCE for Physical Therapy & Rehab Medicine (Feb. 18).
That article focused on JAG Pediatric Therapy in West Orange, NJ, which just opened last fall and treats children with a variety of conditions such as cerebral palsy, developmental coordination disorders, fine-motor delay, gross-motor delay and Marfan syndrome. This clinic is staffed by the two-person, PT/OT team of Megan Acquaro, PT, DPT, and Kathleen Kane, MS, OTR/L. Both talked extensively with ADVANCE about how their services complement each other, how they worked together to launch the clinic and how they continue to team up in growing the practice. In addition to the cover story itself, we produced an exclusive ADVANCE video of Megan and Kathleen on the job.
Do you interact frequently with OT practitioners during the course of your workday? How do you believe that OT/PT collaboration can be enhanced to provide the best outcomes for patients?
SAN DIEGO--There's a popular saying that goes in this vein: There really is no such thing as luck; it is what you do with the situations you are confronted with that determines your own fate.
PTs who are in private practice or who are contemplating such a venture would be wise to adopt this strategy for the foreseeable future, according to the therapists who spoke at CSM June 23 on "Health Care Reform and Professional Autonomy: The Good, the Bad and the Opportunities."
Making the most of navigating the impending health care insurance law changes can make or break how PTs can practice autonomy, and while many of the new rules seem restrictive, it doesn't have to mean that PTs give up autonomy in their practices altogether. The profession would be best served, autonomy-wise, by seizing the opportunity to rethink how PT as a profession approaches the health care bureaucracy table.
"The Affordable Health Care Act pushes development of new health care models and prevention strategies for chronic diseases and improving public health, which overall is a positive thing," stated speaker Ira Gorman, PT, MSPH. Prevention of chronic conditions is a big opportunity for the PT profession, Gorman stressed. "We're great at that secondary and tertiary care, after the problem has begun," he said. "We should start looking more at primary preventive care; often this is not appreciated and as we know it often is not paid for."
The key is keeping the autonomy of the PT profession respected within the health care bureaucracy, which will end up determining standards of payment and how outcomes are achieved, added Robert Sandstrom, PT, PhD. "Stats show more doctors are joining hospitals and health systems rather than go into private practice. It's an interesting and sobering idea of the effect that added bureaucracy can have on an autonomous profession." At the core is the doctor/clinician-patient relationship that remains valued; could moves toward ACOs and the like put an effective end to this relationship?
"Things like joining ACOs don't have to mean a threat to our autonomy outright, for either physicians or for physical therapists in practice. We can help steer and initiate new payment reforms that give clinicians more flexibility within those [rules]," Gorman said.
Gorman, Sandstrom and Stacey Ziegler, PT, DPT, outlined what they called the "good, the bad and the opportunities" for the PT profession in lieu of the coming changes. The good: the ACA is aimed at adding 32 million more health care consumers nationwide; more patients of baby boomer age-between ages 55-70-are now opting for more and better care options and are a huge patient population; and insurance reforms are beginning to focus on outcomes-oriented accountability and evidence-based practices-areas that are PT's stronghold.
The "bad": the development of an Independent Payment Advisory Commission (IPAC); no payment reprieves for outpatient therapy under the cap and no updates yet on fee schedule cuts; market cuts to home health and some other settings, and more regulatory activism under MPPRs, RAC enrollments and a Corporate Practice of Medicine doctrine.
But with the good and the bad come opportunities, the speakers stressed. PT's role in new models of care can open doors for the profession that were previously closed, particularly in primary care aspects and prevention and wellness initiatives.
"More than 90 percent of health care consumers surveyed have a positive impression of PT," Ziegler said. "We have both opportunities and challenges in front of us in participation in ACOs; we are going to have to come to the table to demonstrate to the public our knowledge, expertise and value as a component of integrated care," she said.
As of now, 300 ACOs are operating within 48 states, she said, so the time is now. "As Thomas Paine once said, we need to lead, follow or get out of the way," she said. "These can either be rules that are happening TO us, or they can be opportunities that present us with taking the mess and finding the message."
The following post was written by ADVANCE guest blogger Brian Knutsen, OTR/L, CHT, president of Buzzards Bay Hand Therapy LLC, located in Marion and Lexington, MA.
SAN DIEGO -- In the CSM session, "Emerging Technologies for Enhancing Post-Stroke Arm Rehabilitation," speakers Mindy Levin, PT, PhD, and Michelle Harris-Love PT, PhD, discussed two specific examples of emerging technologies for the treatment of UE deficits post-stroke: virtual reality (VR)/robotics and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
VR and robotics are designed to incorporate motor learning into rehab through an interactive learning process using highly repetitive movement activities. TMS is a non-invasive method to stimulate the brain. The speakers went into detail about these techniques and explained that existing research sends mixed signals. Some studies show promise regarding the effectiveness of these technologies, but many others have yet to prove or validate that effectiveness.
Despite my fascination with these technologies (who doesn't want more "toys?!"), I couldn't help but think how far off/unrealistic these tools are for me and my small private practice. Costing thousands and thousands of dollars each, these tools are certainly not in my budget. The use of these modern technologies is generally limited to large facilities with substantial budgets for capital equipment.
These technologies, along with many demonstrated in the exhibit hall, are intriguing to say the least, but just not possible for many clinics with smaller budgets. Each year, the number of papers written on these technologies continues to increase dramatically. Hopefully as more studies show/prove the effectiveness of these tools, the price tags will drop, making the technology more of a reality for smaller practices.
The following post was written by ADVANCE guest blogger Brian Knutsen, OTR/L, CHT, president of Buzzards Bay Hand Therapy LLC, located in Marion and Lexington, MA.
SAN DIEGO -- In the CSM session, "Practice, Coding, Documentation and Reimbursement," Nancy Beckley, MS, MBA, CHC, shared a quick Medicare update to start. The audience then launched into a brief discussion about how confusing and downright inconsistent Medicare billing standards have become in the practice of hand therapy.
It was comforting for me to hear other clinicians from around the country explain their frustrations and scenarios that paralleled those in my own small practice in Massachusetts. Being a small clinic owner with only one employee (myself), I complete all the billing and coding on my own. It's apparent to me now that similar issues occur in larger clinics and facilities that have an entire department dedicated to billing issues.
Despite our frustrations with Medicare and other private payers, we learned that we must work hard to be as compliant as possible in order to protect ourselves legally, as well as ensure we are paid appropriately for the care we provide our patients. Lynn S. McGivern, JD, LLM, shared helpful specifics regarding standards for good compliance for DME in rehab clinics. I'll be sure to check out the Palmetto website for detailed information about DME standards and review my own compliance policies when I return home from the conference.
Bridget Morehouse, PT, MBA, touched on coverage and reimbursement as they relate to varying commercial payers. Although I would have much rather attended a session relating to clinical practice, this session was imperative for me to attend. The information is vital for clinicians striving to remain updated and compliant with coding and billing requirements. Ultimately if we don't keep abreast of these requirements, despite our frustration with third-party payers, we'll lose the reimbursement we all deserve and possibly open ourselves up to legal issues.
What does your clinic do to ensure compliance?