This guest blog post was written by Jerry Henderson, PT, vice president of clinical community at Clinicient in Portland, Ore.
I personally believe that our profession is an excellent value. That is, our efforts provide a great benefit for the cost. Unfortunately, regardless of the conviction of my beliefs, we have an obligation to prove it to payers and, more importantly, to the consumer. Believing that we provide a great value is easy... proving it is hard.
Value is often defined as outcomes divided by costs. But measuring outcomes and, to a lesser extent, costs is difficult. Of course if we can't measure costs or outcomes, we can't prove our value.
Nearly every physical therapist I've ever known will tell me they provide superior outcomes. This is, of course, absurd. Not everyone is superior. I believe that many of my colleagues provide great care. But, of course, some provide only average care and there are even a small number who provide (gasp!) substandard care.
|Jerry Henderson, PT|
Let's compare measuring physical therapy effectiveness to effectiveness for medical problems:
For certain cancers, a crude measurement of effectiveness is based on mortality. Just studying what was done for the patients who lived compared to the ones who died provides great information on outcomes.
Type 2 diabetes is another example. Manipulating diet and drugs while monitoring lab values and controlling for demographic variables and lifestyle provides an amazing amount of useful information on morbidity.
Rehabilitation professionals do not (except in the most extreme cases) have a role in extending life. We don't treat diseases. We help our patients improve function. The absence of death is very easy to measure. The absence or improvement of disease is generally measurable.
In contrast, improvement in function can be difficult to measure. Medicare's attempt to somehow measure function is a case in point. In the absence of universally accepted objective standards for measuring functional improvement, Medicare instituted an extremely subjective process of classifying patients and rating their impairment. The current state of the art in measuring functional improvement is based on patient questionnaires, which are rough subjective indicators of functional status, not objective measurements of function.
In addition, understanding which interventions were provided in rehabilitation specialties is difficult. In medicine, it is pretty clear which drugs were prescribed. In rehabilitation specialties, it is not at all clear which procedures were performed, since there is no standard nomenclature across the professions for therapeutic exercise and manual therapy, and the procedure codes that we use for billing do little to describe what was actually done.
Surprisingly, measuring cost is also problematic, simply because healthcare records are stored in multiple, non-integrated databases. Take the example of a patient who has an elective orthopedic surgery for a knee replacement. That patient may have been seen by a family doctor for a number of years, and a physical therapist for a period of time prior to referral to an orthopedic surgeon.
Chances are good that the cost data for the treatment of that condition has already been stored in at least three different data repositories, and that's before the patient is hospitalized for surgery. On top of all that, there is nothing preventing the patient from changing insurance companies, introducing yet another data silo.
Theoretically, a payer may be able to correlate all of that information from the outpatient and inpatient providers and get an accurate idea of the cost, but there are many reasons to believe it is doubtful.
Measuring Overall Value
This article in the Harvard Business Review, "Getting Real About Healthcare Value," makes the point that comparing the true value of improvements in health status is extremely difficult. For one thing, the potential side benefits of effective treatment are not taken into account.
To illustrate with an example, many studies show that physical therapy is effective in treating and preventing chronic low-back pain, and that it saves many other immediate costs including unnecessary imaging and invasive procedures. One can hypothesize that many other conditions are potentially improved or prevented by effective treatment for that patient population, including obesity, arthritis and heart disease, creating a stunning "multiplier effect" that results in decreased healthcare costs in years to come.
We have a huge opportunity to improve on the value proposition of our profession, but we need to start with using integrated information systems that help guide our clinical decision-making, standardize our terminology, improve outcome measurements, and track our costs.
The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Alexandria, Va., issued an Oct. 8 press release detailing how the organization has spoken out in The New York Times (NYT). This initiative was precipitated by recent reports that skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are taking advantage of Medicare billing policies. The APTA states that these allegations underscore the need to replace volume-based payment systems with systems tied to value.
In a letter to the editor published today, APTA President Sharon L. Dunn, PT, PhD, OCS, responded to a September 30 NYT article titled, "Nursing Homes Bill for More Therapy Than Patients Need, US Says." That story focused on a report from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the US Department of Health and Human Services alleging that Medicare payments have "greatly exceeded SNF costs for therapy for a decade."
According to the APTA press release, this OIG report and related media coverage are directly related to the pressures being placed on physical therapists, physical therapist assistants and other providers to meet productivity demands that can sometimes run counter to actual treatment needed.
"The provision of physical therapy services should be driven by patient need and the clinical judgment of the licensed physical therapist," Dunn writes in her letter. "Productivity goals that drive services toward economic incentives continue to be an issue that policymakers and professional associations have a joint responsibility to meet."
Much of the criticism of SNFs is centered on the use of ultrahigh therapy hours in billing practices, the APTA press release continued. CMS estimates this tactic provides facilities with an average of $66 a day in payments over costs. In the APTA letter to NYT, Dunn also describes APTA's collaborative efforts to address volume-based vs. value-based care, and how the association's "Integrity in Practice" campaign aims to provide PTs and PTAs with resources to support care based on patient need and clinical judgment.
"We are committed to making sure that the correct incentives are invoked in care delivery, in a manner that maintains our patients' trust," the letter states.
What are your thoughts about these developments and the issue of unethical billing practices? Share your comments below!
Yoga and Pilates are both well known in the therapy world and are often used as a complementary activity for patients with chronic pain and long-term conditions. Not many people, however, use Tai Chi as an example of such exercises - but maybe they should start.
The British Journal of Sports and Medicine published a systematic review on the effects of Tai Chi on four specific chronic conditions: osteoarthritis, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and breast cancer. The study was put together by a team of researchers in the University of British Columbia's Physical Therapy department, located in Vancouver. The idea behind the study was to see if Tai Chi would be a successful activity for easing the symptoms and quality of life for people with one or more of these conditions.
The results were as follows: "Meta-analyses showed that Tai Chi improved or showed a tendency to improve physical performance outcomes, including 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and knee extensor strength, in most or all four chronic conditions. Tai Chi also improved disease-specific symptoms of pain and stiffness in OA [osteoarthritis]."
They concluded that Tai Chi could be used as a safe form of exercise for people with one or multiple chronic conditions, and showed a tendency to improve physical performance in those with said conditions.
PTs, have you ever incorporated Tai Chi for patients with chronic conditions? If so, how do they compare to activities such as yoga or Pilates? If you haven't, would you ever consider using Tai Chi in your practice? Share with us in the comments!
Editor's note: This blog post was guest written by Kelly McFarland, PT, DPT
Any physical therapist who has chosen to get into aquatics knows how beneficial it is for patients. However, it's not always straightforward. In order to provide exceptional aquatic therapy to clients, you have to be willing to make changes along the way.
Some of my biggest tips for colleagues who are just starting out with aquatic care include:
Focus on one patient in the pool at a time. Unless you invest in a large static therapy pool that can accommodate multiple people simultaneously, don't be tempted to add more than one patient in the pool at a time. Our pool is state-of-the-art, and we have chosen to have one individual and one physical therapist in the pool for each 45-minute session. This helps us give incredibly personalized feedback and encouragement. Plus, it allows us to be inventive and progress according to the client's abilities and personal desires. This individualized approach pays off in a big way when it comes to patient satisfaction and client referrals.
Offer some special touches for clients. I love the water, and you might, too; yet there are plenty of clients who don't feel as fond about getting out of their clothes, getting into bathing suits or comfortable clothing, and then getting into the pool (even though it's warm.) Besides, even if someone usually likes the water, it can be intimidating after surgery or when someone's in pain. To build their enthusiasm and cut down on the possibility of them missing appointments, make the experience somewhat spa-like. We actually provide robes to patients when they come out of the pool, and progress them depending upon their needs during each visit. It takes a lot of energy to be patient and understanding, but it's worth it!
Never fall back on cookie cutter protocols. Every client is unique, and that means every patient's protocol needs to be just as original in design. For some people, turning on the resistance jets is the perfect way to get them working a little harder. For others, the key is to start them on gait re-training using the underwater treadmill. Certainly, some exercises overlap between patients, which is normal, but everyone in our aquatics program is case-by-case. This is why it's important to...
Invest in training for all your physical therapists. We all need to have exercises in our proverbial "back pockets" that range from very easy to very challenging. These can involve pool equipment such as specialty weights and noodles. The best way to learn what others are doing is to attend classes. Fortunately, there are free webinars where physical therapists can learn about aquatics in easy-to-watch, concise web-based events presented by professionals in the field.
Consider aquatics as an adjunct to your other practice offerings. Let's face it -- unless your patients are never going to leave the water, most of them will need to be able to transition to land-based physical therapy at some point. Aquatics needs to be a niche part of your practice, a complement to everything else you offer. It's your secret weapon! Use it to set you apart from all the competitors vying for your same clientele. Many people misunderstand aquatics and believe it cannot be aggressive or lead to incredible transformations; we know that's not true, and science backs this claim.
There are other tips to offer, of course, but these are five of the best for people who are investing in therapy pools at their practices. As long as you keep your clients' needs in mind, as well as the practicalities involved in billing insurance for aquatic therapy, you'll be on your way to setting the stage for a thriving business.
Kelly McFarland is owner of Premier Rehab Physical Therapy, with locations in Keller, North Richland Hills, and Fort Worth, Texas.
The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Alexandria, Va., recently issued a press release concerning a new study. Published in the Forum for Health Economics & Policy, the study is titled "Physician Self-Referral of Physical Therapy Services for Patients with Low Back Pain: Implications for Use, Types of Treatments Received and Expenditures." It offers insight into the cost and utilization patterns of physicians who self-refer to physical therapist services for low back pain (LBP). According to the APTA, the survey builds on and fills in gaps of a previous US Government Accountability Office (GAO) study on self-referral.
The press release stated: "Two significant findings revealed that self-referring physicians refer more patients to physical therapy for LBP, but for fewer visits per episode while, on average, costing significantly more than non-self-referring providers. Patients who saw self-referring providers also received more passive treatment, which is not hands-on, does not engage the patient, and is proven to be less effective for treatment of LBP.
The study, which was funded by the Foundation for Physical Therapy and the National Institute on Aging, took an alternative approach to look at the differences in physical therapist services provided by self-referring providers and non-self-referring providers. The study's focused look at LBP allowed researchers to more accurately classify self-referring and non-self-referring providers than the GAO report could, allowing it to pinpoint whether the physical therapy given was "active," meaning hands-on and engaged with the patient, or "passive," relying on some physical agent or modality; for example, giving the patient an ice pack to place on an injury. It is important to note that "passive" treatments can be performed by a person who is not a licensed physical therapist.
Researchers found that non-self-referred episodes of care were far more likely, 52% as opposed to 36% for self-referrers, to provide "active" physical therapist services. This, according to the study's authors, suggests the care delivered by PTs in non-self-referred episodes is more tailored to promote patient independence and a return to performing routine activities without pain.
Other significant findings to come out of the study indicate that self-referring physicians were more than 2.5 times as likely to prescribe physical therapy to patients but, as previously mentioned, for less time and for more passive treatment. And on average, spending for self-referring providers was $144 per episode of care compared with an average of $73 for non-self-referring providers."
What are your thoughts about this distinctive study and its findings?
While there are many important differences between the physical and occupational therapy fields, it is more often than not found that each profession can learn a lot from the other.
Back in July I went to visit Phoebe Ministries, a non-profit, multi-facility organization specializing in health care, housing, and support services for seniors located in Allentown, Pa., to learn about their newest implemented therapy program, NET (Neurocognitive Engagement Therapy), which focuses on helping individuals with cognitive impairment regain their function and return to their home environment using traditional as well as nontraditional therapy methods.
Although this program seems to be more OT driven, it actually requires an interdisciplinary team, including physical therapists. In fact, the program's founder is a PT. Jennifer Howanitz, MPT and Director of Rehab Services at Phoebe Allentown, said that when she got to Phoebe with a PT background, and saw there was no unit focused solely on dementia care, she wanted to make that happen and give therapists that kind of training that they hadn't had before.
Howanitz told ADVANCE that the physical therapists at Phoebe are learning how to get more in touch with their creative side, instead of always going by the books and doing things only the way they were taught in school. "It has been more of a challenge for PT's to not be so black and white," said Howanitz. "OT's tend to be more creative naturally," she added.
Howanitz said that because of the program's overwhelming success with both therapists and patients, physical therapists are learning that they can be more creative with their patients. "The PT's are doing well because the program works. They are seeing these approaches work and it is sparking their creativity. Success breeds confidence and creativity."
Although the clinical side of PT is as important as anything, it is nice for PT's to know that they have a chance to branch away from traditional therapy for a bit - which is good not only for the patients they work with, but for themselves, too.
PTs, have you had an experience working with an OT and gained knowledge from their therapy practices? Do you think that physical therapists should start considering more nontraditional approaches? Tell us in the comments below, and click the link to read more about the NET program at Phoebe Ministries!
The explosive growth of interest in the world's most popular game -- soccer -- is perhaps the most striking development in American sporting culture over the past several years. In previous decades, as the rest of the globe worshipped the sport like a religion, the United States stubbornly held out as a nation that viewed soccer with relative apathy, fixating instead on football, baseball, basketball, and hockey.
But that tide is certainly changing, if not at the expense of those other sports, then at least in addition to them. In fact the latest ADVANCE cover story details the meteoric rise of Major League Soccer (MLS), now celebrating its 20th season with surging levels of attendance, interest, quality of play, and worldwide relevance.
What makes the enhanced interest in soccer nationwide even more fascinating is that unlike most traditional sports followed by Americans, soccer has generated significant fandom for both male and female competitions. On the men's side, in addition to the swelling popularity of MLS, the U.S. national team has clearly become a respected player on the global scene by qualifying for seven consecutive World Cups and advancing to the knockout round of the last two (2010 and 2014). Even non-soccer fans had to be impressed last summer by the fervent patriotism and enthusiasm accompanying game watches for the U.S. team at block parties and bars across the country, while the World Cup played out thousands of miles away in Brazil.
Meanwhile the U.S. women's team just routed Japan, 5-2, in their own World Cup final on July 5 to spectacularly earn the title of top female squad on the planet. That match also became the most-watched soccer game in United States history. Not just the most-watched women's game, but the most-watched game, period. Its 26.7 domestic viewers just edged out the 26.5 million who tuned in for last summer's epic World Cup men's final between Germany and Argentina.
So it's fair to say our great country is now truly recognizing what the rest of the world has long seen -- how captivating and uniting this remarkable sport can be. What do you think about soccer's surging significance in America? Have you become a more devoted fan over the past few years too? For readers who treat athletes, are you noticing more kids and adults these days who play soccer, male or female? Let us know!
From June 19-28, more than 240 wounded, ill, and injured service members and veterans from across the country gathered for the annual Department of Defense Warrior Games at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. Athletes represented teams from the Marine Corps, Army, Navy, Air Force and U.S. Special Operations Command. This was the first year the DoD organized the games, usually done by the United States Olympic Committee.
In his welcome letter, Major General Juan G. Ayala of the United States Marine Corps and Commander, Task Force at the Warrior Games said, "Since its inception in 2011, the DoD's Military Adaptive Sports Program has helped wounded, ill and injured Service members recover and rehabilitate for transition back into their military units or into civilian society. All of us in the Marine Corps, and across the DoD, are extremely proud to be part of an endeavor that is both beneficial and rewarding for our Nation's warriors."
According to the Department of Defense, "adaptive sports and athletic reconditioning activities play a fundamental role in recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration of service members back to their units, or as they transition into the civilian environment." Service members participated in games like wheelchair basketball, sitting volleyball, swimming, shooting, and track.
Team Army actually had a team of six physical therapists join them at the games, ensuring their safety, maintaining their health, and maximizing their performance. Army came out on top at the games, earning 162 total medals.
Did Army come out victorious because of their PT team? Do you think all the teams should have a group of therapists attend the games? Let us know in the comments!
"I shall not cry because it's over. I shall smile because it happened."
With a nod to Dr. Seuss, Jim Thornton, MA, ATC, CES, outgoing president of the National Athletic Trainers Association (NATA), put a stamp on his tenure at the "Changing of the Guard" ceremony during the NATA's 66th Annual Symposia and AT Expo, held in St. Louis June 24-27, 2015.
The NATA welcomes Scott Sailor, EdD, ATC, as incoming president for the next three years. Sailor, chair of the kinesiology department at Fresno State University, began his official tenure June 25.
"I'm very excited to become your 13th president," Sailor told the capacity ballroom crowd. "I believe we can accomplish amazing things. I do not take this responsibility lightly." He was elected in October 2014.
As objectives for his presidency, Sailor [pictured at right] specified ongoing misunderstandings among many policymakers surrounding what athletic trainers do, and the development of a strategic plan reflecting the modern needs and experiences of today's athletic trainer. In May 2015, the NATA's board of directors approved a mission statement and vision statement to guide the profession.
"Great opportunity lies before us," Sailor said. "I challenge each one of us to get involved."
Position Statement on Spine Injury
In other conference news, the association released an executive summary of a new inter-association consensus statement on "Appropriate Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete." This is an update to the original 1998 consensus statement guidelines in light of recent changes in literature for pre-hospital treatment protocols and a discussion among task force and spine trauma researchers.
"These updated recommendations are critical to ensure proper and immediate care of the athlete and to reduce or prevent catastrophic outcomes," said task force chair and NATA Vice President MaryBeth Horodyski, EdD, ATC, FNATA. "The athletic trainer and other members of the sports medicine team must work together to ensure clear and immediate communication. Establishing an Emergency Action Plan for use and review by the sports medicine team is essential."
The 14-point plan, which covers immediate assessment, equipment removal, immobilization and transportation guidelines, is viewable at www.nata.org/access-read/public/consensus-statements. Also look for a full-length feature article by Horodyski in the July issue of ADVANCE.
Public Perception of Athletic Training
During J&J Day, a block of programming sponsored by Johnson & Johnson June 25, a four-member speaker panel discussed "A Patient-Centered Vision for the Future of the Athletic Training Profession." Audience members heard opinions on the way athletic trainers are viewed by patients, school administrators and politicians.
"We've got a very serious issue with the way the public perceives us," said Gary Wilkerson, EdD, ATC, professor at the University of Tennessee Chattanooga. "We've got to do more to make the public aware that we are health professionals."
Wilkerson still receives feedback that views the AT profession as "taping ankles, dispensing water, massage, and coaching." Athletic trainers must position themselves as separate from a team's coaching staff, and become the managers of the full spectrum of health needs for a specific population, said Wilkerson. He pointed to such differentiators as concussion management, cardiac issues, asthma and lifting and training technique to underscore the value of ATs as healthcare providers.
"We have to be the protectors of the welfare of our student-athletes," he said.
Athletic Training Moves to a Master's
Finally, the NATA held an open discussion with membership regarding the proposal to transition the athletic training profession to an entry-level master's degree. More information can be viewed at www.atstrategicalliance.org
The morning of June 4 started very early for more than 1,000 dedicated attendees at the American Physical Therapy Association's NEXT 2015 Conference & Exposition in National Harbor, Md. These hardy souls awoke before the sun, donned their professional best and headed downstairs by 6 a.m. for a quick breakfast before boarding shuttle buses bound for nearby Washington, D.C. The much-anticipated PT Day on Capitol Hill had arrived!
Despite the early hour, their energy and enthusiasm abounded. Led by Michael Matlack, APTA director of grassroots and political affairs, the attendees disembarked from their shuttle buses in front of the Capitol Building and paraded to a nearby lawn. The light drizzle couldn't dampen spirits as they anticipated their opportunity to march into the Capitol and talk with legislators about the pertinent issues impacting the PT profession.
A succession of speakers addressed the attendees while they waited until 9 a.m. to make their move. Among them was APTA Past President Paul A. Rockar Jr., PT, DPT, MS, who said, "Our goal today is to communicate the value and importance of physical therapy in healthcare, and the way that it transforms lives. I've learned a lot of lessons about advocacy over the years, and one of the most important is we can't take for granted that our role in educating legislators will be done by somebody else. We need to do it. From sharing with them the real-life patient stories about the harmful impact of the therapy cap, to reminding them about the vital role physical therapists play in treating concussions and our job as the number-one resource in physical therapy. We're all equally accountable in finding a role to ensure our success."
Rockar was followed at the podium by Rep. Xavier Becerra of California, an important ally of the profession who has co-sponsored HR 775. This bill, the "Medicare Access to Rehabilitation Services Act," would repeal the outpatient therapy cap.
|Congressman Xavier Becerra, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for California's 34th congressional district.|
"I want you all to know that many members of Congress are with us on this," he told the audience. "Including my friend Rep. Charles Boustany from Louisiana, the principal co-sponsor along with me of HR 775, which will undo this fits and starts way of providing the best care to a lot of Americans who have paid for it under Medicare. We want to say thank you for their support. Shout out nice and loud so everybody in the Capitol Building over there can hear you, we're ready to make sure HR 775 becomes the law of the land!"
Finally, Matlack himself spoke, looking proudly out on the eager group he had played such a vital role in assembling.
"I want to share with you one of my favorite quotes when it comes to advocacy," he said. "These are the words of Thomas Jefferson: ‘We in America do not have government by the majority, we have government by the majority who participate.' You're participating, and I really appreciate that. All of you came to D.C. to do this. Now we need to tell our colleagues back home. Because it's not just one time you're here to advocate. You need to continue to do that. Today you're participating for your profession, patients and colleagues. Are you ready to share with your members of Congress and their staffs how physical therapy can provide the answers and savings for the healthcare system? Today is our opportunity to highlight the benefits of rehabilitation and the services we provide. Let's make history!"
NATIONAL HARBOR, MD -- The APTA Annual Conference & Exposition, which was rebranded last year as "NEXT," just celebrated its 2015 incarnation in this inviting little town on the Potomac River outside Washington, D.C. The conference drew thousands of excited physical therapy professionals and advocates from all over the country, kicking off the night of June 3 with a memorable opening event.
Replicating last year's well-received format, APTA CFO Rob Batarla served as host of a "Tonight Show"-style presentation, in which APTA leaders gave their thoughts on the profession and entertained the crowd in a variety of ways.
The first guest was APTA CEO Michael Bowers, who was asked by Batarla to talk about the organization's goals. "I couldn't be more excited to be working with the members that we have," Bowers responded. "The focus of the APTA is to transform society, which can be a very large task. We have to make sure the profession is ready to do transformational work through education, research and practice."
Bowers was followed on stage by APTA Past President Paul A. Rockar Jr., PT, DPT, MS, and newly elected APTA President Sharon L. Dunn, PT, PhD, OCS, who both drew laughs from the audience by playing a lighthearted trivia game about Rockar's recently completed three-year term in office.
For the final question, "What does Paul Rockar most regret about his presidential tenure?" he earned cheers by saying, "I regret nothing, and I can't wait for Sharon to experience that same feeling."
But the highlight of the night was Keynote Speaker Billie Jean King, the legendary women's tennis player and social rights advocate who charmed the audience with tales of her playing career, and efforts to spread the cause of feminism both on and off the court.
"The thing about tennis, like soccer, is that it's really a global sport, which has given me a great opportunity to make a difference," she said.
King also paid tribute to the impact physical therapy has made on her.
"I've given you a lot of employment in my life," she said with a laugh. "You not only take care of us physically but you help with the emotional part too. It's a calling to be a PT. I don't think it's just a job. You're very special people, so give yourselves a pat on the back."
The night ended with a spectacle few will soon forget, as King took out a tennis racket while "Philadelphia Freedom" began playing through the speakers. Elton John actually wrote this song about King almost 40 years ago and named it after the tennis team she played for at the time. While delighted attendees danced to the popular tune and cheered the charismatic icon before them, King wound a path up and down the aisles, hitting souvenir tennis balls all around.
As many ADVANCE readers are likely aware, the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) last year rebranded its traditional "Annual Conference & Exposition" as simply "NEXT". The APTA website stated at the time, "It's a name change, but more than that it's a commitment to making APTA's June conference about looking into the future of physical therapy. ‘NEXT' isn't an abbreviation, but it does stand for something: It's a name thematic of where this conference and profession are headed."
From June 3-6, NEXT 2015 will be held in National Harbor, Md., a stone's throw away from Washington, D.C. According to APTA: "NEXT is the leading-edge event for physical therapy professionals with trend-setting programming, innovative content, and exclusive access to the profession's forward thinkers. This year NEXT coincides with PT Day on Capitol Hill, giving you the chance to rally on Washington with your peers and meet with your elected representatives."
PT Day on Capitol Hill is expected to include more than 1,000 physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and students on June 4. Attendees will first rally by the Capitol before participating in scheduled meetings with their elected representatives in Congress, providing "a special opportunity to advocate for the physical therapy profession and the patients it serves!" exclaims the APTA website.
Aside from this signature event, NEXT will continue to offer hallmarks of previous annual conferences, including the 46th McMillan Lecture (presented by Lynn Snyder-Mackler, PT, ScD, ATC, SCS, FAPTA), and the 20th John H.P. Maley Lecture (offered by Gad Alon, PT, PhD). In addition, the popular Oxford Debate returns, with this year's topic "Mind Your Business" exploring whether all physical therapists should demonstrate comprehensive business management and marketing principles as an entry-level skill in all settings. Finally, the keynote speaker will be Billie Jean King, a Hall of Fame female tennis player who was named one of the "100 Most Important Americans of the 20th Century" by LIFE Magazine.
For prospective attendees unfamiliar with National Harbor, the location's official website offers this description: "Perched on the historic Potomac River, National Harbor is a unique, all-in-one destination and all-American tradition, offering unrivaled shopping, dining and attractions and a roster of year-round, family-friendly events. Featuring expansive views from the riverbank -- and from 180 feet up on The Capital Wheel, the waterfront's newest iconic draw -- National Harbor combines an approachable, resort-like personality with a singular, dynamic experience for local residents and visitors alike. With more than 10 million annual visitors, there's simply nowhere else on the Eastern Seaboard you'll find this mix of things to do, see and experience."
You can count on ADVANCE to be there covering all the action at NEXT, reporting on the sights and sounds of National Harbor, Capitol Hill and the APTA. Stay tuned to our Facebook page, Twitter handle, and of course traditional website for informative blog posts, quotes from influential leaders and insightful images. Will you be attending NEXT too? What are your hopes and expectations for the conference?
Lately, it seems like everyone wants their exercise to be hot. Hot Pilates, hot lifting, hot spinning, and, easily the most popular currently, hot yoga (or Bikram). The more I read about it and the more good things I hear from friends and family, the more I am intrigued to try it. But, I also wonder: is doing a supposedly relaxing form of exercise in extreme heat with humidity really good for your physical health?
I came across an article in The Atlantic today called "The Enduring Appeal of Being Hot." It goes into how hot yoga has become so popular and what appeal exercising in heated conditions really has - a lot of people think it's all about how you feel mentally and emotionally, but some think it has physical benefits.
Many common goals of physical therapy can be assisted with implementing yoga into the patient's overall program: balance, flexibility, and alignment are just a few. But what would a physical therapist think about the practice of hot yoga? Does it have the same benefits? Does it help more? Maybe it actually goes against the purposes of yoga for physical therapy.
ADVANCE asks Lauren, who is a recent DPT graduate, what her opinion is on the matter. "Some [physical therapy] exercises are very similar to other forms of physical activity such as Pilates or yoga. Some physical therapists even choose to get furthering continuing education in these different realms, with physical evidence available for the physiological benefits of participating in yoga or other activities."
"Though," she continues, "at this time, there is very limited evidence on the benefits of hot yoga in particular. More research would need to be done in order to determine its physiological benefits."
Interestingly enough, everyone I have asked said that hot yoga makes them feel better both mentally and physically. Though when asked what particular physical benefits they feel are taking place, the answer becomes lost in translation.
ADVANCE readers, from a PT standpoint, do you feel that Bikram or hot yoga compared to normal yoga has any added benefit? If more evidence came out supporting hot yoga as its own form of therapy, would you recommend it to your clients? Do you have any personal experience with hot yoga or studies that suggest it may help? Let us know in the comments below!
NASHVILLE -- During her Presidential Address at the American Occupational Therapy Association's 95th Annual Conference & Expo, held April 16-18 in Nashville, AOTA President Virginia "Ginny" Stoffel, PhD, OT, BCMH, FAOTA, took stock of the current state of the profession and set a course for the decades ahead.
Stoffel is associate professor in the department of occupational science and technology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The association's 29th president, she is currently in her second year of a three-year term.
The profession's numbers are growing rapidly, reported Stoffel. While a recent AOTA count placed the number of practicing OTs, OTAs and students at 140,000, more recent estimates place the count closer to 185,000. And according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, by 2022, there will be a need for 29% more OTs and 43% more OTAs.
"We need to set 100,000 as our next membership target," said Stoffel in relation to the rising ranks of OT practitioners. "Can you imagine how much more we could accomplish." Stoffel acknowledged the commitment of OT professionals worldwide, having made 36 trips so far as president.
"Engagement strategies may well be one of our greatest strengths as a profession," said Stoffel.
And as 2017 approaches -- the 100-year anniversary of the profession -- AOTA must look beyond that milestone and set new objectives, said Stoffel. The association has retained a public relations and branding firm to craft a new vision statement, in addition to member feedback in the form of focus groups, and electronic surveys. The new vision will be unveiled at next year's conference in Chicago.
"It's time to update our vision for the profession, to look carefully and boldly toward the future," announced Stoffel. "I hope that our future holds a clear, lit path to empowerment as a core attitude of all occupational therapy practitioners."
View more coverage from AOTA here.
The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), Alexandria, Va., issued a press release on April 9 detailing the results of a recent study published in the scientific journal BMC Health Services Research. The study demonstrated that early and guideline-adherent physical therapy following an initial episode of acute, non-specific low-back pain (LBP) resulted in substantially lower costs and reduced use of healthcare resources over a two-year period.
The press release continued: "Physical therapist researchers John D. Childs, PT, PhD, et al analyzed 122,723 patients who went to a primary care physician following an initial LBP episode and received physical therapy within 90 days. Of these, 24% (17,175) received early physical therapy (within 14 days) that adhered to guidelines for active treatment. During a two-year time period, these patients made significantly less use of advanced imaging, lumbar spinal injections, lumbar spine surgery, and opioids than did patients in other combinations of timing and adherence."
Early PT patients also had 60% lower LBP-related costs, compared with 33.5% (23,993) of patients who had delayed and adherent physical therapy (between 14 and 90 days). Patients received physical therapy within the Military Health System, one of the largest single-payer systems in the United States.
"Physical therapy as the starting point of care in your low-back pain episode can have significant positive implications," Childs explained. "Receiving physical therapy treatment that adheres to practice guidelines even furthers than benefit."
Clinical guideline recommendations in military and civilian settings are to avoid opioids and advanced imaging procedures as a first-line of treatment. However, research done mainly in civilian settings has revealed clinical practice is inconsistent with these recommendations. Childs noted that the study's results extend the findings from civilian settings by demonstrating an association between early guideline-adherent care, costs, and use of healthcare resources in a single-payer health system.
According to American Physical Therapy Association President Paul Rockar Jr., PT, DPT, MS, "Given the enormous burden of excessive and unnecessary treatment for patients with low-back pain, cost savings from physical therapy at the beginning of care has important implications for single-payer health care systems."
What are your thoughts about the findings of this study, and how do you think it may impact the public perception of physical therapy?