<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>It’s Time to Read the Literature </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/pt_2/archive/2009/04/29/it-s-time-to-read-the-literature.aspx</link><description>Last week I had a unique assignment. I was to read an article, present it where I work and report back on the response. Specifically, I was to address whether anyone could follow my presentation and knew the statistics. It didn't surprise me when no one</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>re: It’s Time to Read the Literature </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/pt_2/archive/2009/04/29/it-s-time-to-read-the-literature.aspx#38726</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:38726</guid><dc:creator>Michael Rosenberg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points made. Reading articles can hopefully always stir the thinking process, decision making and treatment ideas. Even might lead to improved clinical research by seeing the weakness of a research article and finding a way to improve on the topic. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.therapyeducationconsulting.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: It’s Time to Read the Literature </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/pt_2/archive/2009/04/29/it-s-time-to-read-the-literature.aspx#38006</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:38006</guid><dc:creator>Christie </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Toni,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You make an excellent point that research is poorly understood. &amp;nbsp;Granted, I graduated with my entry level PT degree (a BS) about 9 years ago, but I have to look back on the prerequisite courses I had then and the required prerequisites to a basic DPT program now. &amp;nbsp;Aside from having to actually have a BS degree to actually ENTER the program, the prerequisites really haven't changed at all. &amp;nbsp;One basic course in statistics. Once in the PT program, one or two research based courses. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are we really providing ourselves with adequate amount of infromation to prepare ourselves for EBP? &amp;nbsp;Between my BS, my transtionary DPT and continuing education in the McKenzie Diploma program, I've taken another research based course at each level. Each time I learn something new. One thing is for certain...basic statistics was not enough to prepare me to really understand concepts such as confidence intervals, kappa values, regression analysis, etc. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps a more thorough understanding of research based statistics is required...I know it would still help me...I know I still have a lot to learn...despite having three separate research classes. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inability to analyze and interpret scientific literature is a huge barrier in any medical field. I think we are at a crossroads where we really need to make a decision on how to best address this deficit. &amp;nbsp;In the end, I think more statistics would have been very beneficial. &amp;nbsp;I dont' know if any of you remember your stats class, but mine was all about the chances of pulling a blue marble out of a bad. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>