Welcome to Health Care POV | sign in | join
Finding My Place In The Respiratory World

Paging McRespiratory

Published August 17, 2012 10:45 AM by Kevin Johnson
Kevin Johnson, RRTMy coworker and I were talking about a medical TV drama we both had watched a few nights ago. In one scene when poo was hitting the proverbial fan one of the Docs told the nurse to "page respiratory stat!" No respiratory therapist was ever shown or identified to be a respiratory therapist, but we were thrilled nonetheless that respiratory was even mentioned...and this got me thinking...

Why is our profession so underrepresented in medical pop culture? Why do we exist only in over head pages? In nearly every medical drama or comedy there is a doctor, a nurse, an administration character and, in the case of my all-time favorite hospital-based television show, a custodian. But never do you see a respiratory therapist.

So why is this? I have two theories:

Theory One: The RT character would be so cool that he or she would make McDreamy look like Urkel, thus throwing forever the pop culture character paradigm into such a tailspin that all shows would have to have a respiratory therapist as a main character in order to garner any viewership or they would be subsequently canceled due to utter lack of interest. As a result, pop culture would become saturated with all things Respiratory (like the Australian invasion of the late 80's). You'd have "You Can't Spell Party Without RT" shirts (trademark pending), RT action figures equipped with working IPV and scaled to size intubation kits; Broadway plays such as Wake Me Up Before You Blow Blow: The Spirometry Story, song tributes like Smells Like Mucomyst, and feature films like Deep Breathe and Cough. Could Hollywood be aware of the consequences of opening this Pandora's Box and instead be keeping our awesomeness in the background for fear of a pop culture shift of epic proportions?

Or...

Theory 2: Is it possible the AARC and other respiratory organizations do such a poor job of pushing, promoting and representing our profession in the medical community in general that when Hollywood comes to do "research" on typical hospital day-to-day operations, respiratory therapists are shown to be little more than an afterthought and are not worthy of mainstream mention?

For the sake of our profession I hope it's #1...

2 comments

Sorry, but it’s closer to theory 2. But I would not say that the AARC did a poor job it’s more that their focus was more on survival and we didn’t have the numbers. As a director in NYC in the 80s I know that our Director of Nursing was lobbying TV programing producers to characterize a nurse as someone more than just a sexy woman whose role was limited to being an object for the doctor. And I think she got results.%0d%0a %0d%0aAlso for decades RTs were mostly guys just trying to get recognition in the hospital, the desire for recognition as a part of society didn’t start until later. The GREAT AMERICAN SMOKEOUT was what I remember as the first vehicle to get RTs into community awareness. Now we have more numbers and people like you who are raising awareness with the desire to have status and presence in our society. Just what we need. %0d%0a%0d%0aThanks,%0d%0a%0d%0aRobert Landis, RRT%0d%0aAirways Development LLC%0d%0awww.airwaysdevelopment.com | @airwaysdev%0d%0a

Robert Landis, , Vice President Airways Development LLC September 4, 2012 1:42 PM

I think the AARC does a decent job for what we pay.

I think part of the problem is that they have to "pick the battles" on what they have the budget to do.   (And courting Hollywood isnt high on the list...lol)

Out of all the therapists I know, only about 10% pay for membership in the AARC.   The other 90% "cant be bothered" to join.   (See my previous posts...lol)    While a few do at least read the AARC Times and Journal when some paying member leaves it in the department, most therapists have this big sense of apathy I have talked about many times.     Not only does it apply for the classes and certifications I talked about, but it is also true of AARC membership.

So, ...  keeping in mind that most of your colleagues "cant be bothered" and thus do not pay to join the AARC...  then the result is they have a limited budget.    

And again...  I dont think courting Hollywood is high on the list of what they need to focus on.  (And I do not see it changing.)

Respectfully,

Brent

Brent Holland, RRT August 17, 2012 8:15 PM

leave a comment



To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below:
 

Search

About this Blog

Keep Me Updated

Recent Posts