<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Prescription Use Only</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/22/prescription-use-only.aspx</link><description>Call it a victim of its own success: Vast improvements in the quality of images obtained with three- and four-dimensional ultrasound technology have contributed to the modality's wide-spread use for non-medical reasons or "entertainment OB scans." According</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>NJ Law to Restrict Sale of Ultrasound Equipment</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/22/prescription-use-only.aspx#41255</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:31:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:41255</guid><dc:creator>Reflections in Real Time</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a bill in my home state of New Jersey that, if passed, will restrict the sale of ultrasound&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Law Bans Entertainment OB Scans</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/22/prescription-use-only.aspx#39442</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:28:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39442</guid><dc:creator>Reflections in Real Time</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my last post I described a bill that was pending in Connecticut that would ban businesses that provided&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Prescription Use Only</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/22/prescription-use-only.aspx#39347</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:39:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39347</guid><dc:creator>Ibeth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a Sonographer and since sonography has not been proven to hurt the fetus in any way, I do not oppose the use of ultrasound for a closer non-diagnostic look at one's future child with of course some regulations. &amp;nbsp;Due to the possibility of forming microbubbles, I believe that there should be a time regulation just to be on the safe side and it should be performed by a trained Sonographer who know what they are doing safely. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that if the industry where to stop the 3D/4D non-diagnostic facilities from performing sonograms for entertainment purposes, it will raise the amount of sonograms we would do in a diagnostic facility. &amp;nbsp; And sure I would love more work but in all reality it's unfair to keep the people from having then when there are no concrete facts to stop them. &amp;nbsp;It's not really &amp;quot;The Land of the Free&amp;quot; if they are not allowed to see their babies with a safe technology method.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Prescription Use Only</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/22/prescription-use-only.aspx#39297</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:46:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39297</guid><dc:creator>Sergio Heredia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I appreciate your comments and appraisal of this issue with &amp;quot;entertainment&amp;quot; US, we have a nearby outfit called First Debut and the families are spending in excess of $700 dlls for the DeLuxe package: 2 portraits, DVD in 3-4D, desk size, wallet sizes, the whole ten yards!, I understand the tech doing this is credentialed by the ARDMS, just wonder if the Registry may have an opinion on this subject, especially when the tech has her big ARDMS certifficate hanging on the wall!, thanks&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>