<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Law Bans Entertainment OB Scans</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/29/law-bans-entertainment-ob-scans.aspx</link><description>In my last post I described a bill that was pending in Connecticut that would ban businesses that provided entertainment obstetrical sonograms. As an update: Connecticut's Governor M. Jodi Rell last week signed the bill into law. According to a story</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>Oregon Close to Requiring Licensure</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/xt_1/archive/2009/06/29/law-bans-entertainment-ob-scans.aspx#39912</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:39:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:39912</guid><dc:creator>Reflections in Real Time</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the June 30, 2009 issue of the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography's newsletter Newswave&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>