<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.advanceweb.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DeLABerations: Forums </title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/forums/29/ShowForum.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Debug Build: 61120.2)</generator><item><title>Immunoassay robotics</title><link>http://community.advanceweb.com/forums/thread/23930.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">06d5312c-37b9-406e-be84-460d8d21f4fc:23930</guid><dc:creator>merelp</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.advanceweb.com/forums/thread/23930.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.advanceweb.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=29&amp;PostID=23930</wfw:commentRss><description>When it comes to make a choice for HIV, HBV, HCV, CMV serology testing automation, I should like to get the feedback of users who already made the choice between:
1-Abbott Architect
2-Bayer Advia Centaur
3-Beckman Coulter DxI
4-Ortho Vitros
5-Roche Modular

Of course it depends of throughput, but let's talk about practability of robotics, and performance of tests. Thanxxx.&lt;hr&gt;Patrick Merel, PhD, Bordeaux, France.</description></item></channel></rss>