I am ready to take my lumps; but I must speak my mind since I have
found this situation disturbing enough to wake me from sleep early
Sunday morning.
Regarding the "Letters to the Editor"
concerning some-more-than-other offended school nurses: I find it
unfortunate that a professional nurse, or any other professional for
that matter, cannot accept certain POVs without automatically becoming
defensive and outraged. Enough already. It seems that when encountered
with a painful observation about themself or their profession, many
people first and last become irritated and annoyed before taking a
moment to consider the merits of the perceived attack and reflect on
whether a kernel of truth may exist as an opportunity for growth.
Ms.
Slowick, the author of the original article whom I would not know if I
tumbled over her, noted that some school health nurses may not be
willing to invest the time to learn updated information to become
better skilled in managing diabetic children. This to me is not an
outrageous observation; Ms. Slowick was most likely correct; and her position could be extrapolated out to any sub-specialty in nursing.
In
one reality, some nurses more than other nurses are intrinsically more
motivated to improve themselves, their profession, and keep current to
best advocate for their patients and colleagues. However, in another
reality, some professional nurses are quite content, or at least
complacent, to "cruise"; and to not pursue the rigors of sweeping
continuing education in their specialty. Taking it a step further,
nurses should be teaching their own colleagues to become better nurses
and better physicians, too. Sometimes this actually does happen in
supportive learning environments and it's a beautiful thing to see and
experience.
I do not believe that this is Ms. Slowick
attacking her peers as Ms. Shellenberger states; rather I see it as Ms.
Slowick presenting a disturbing observation for us all to take to
heart. Why not be willing to accept the point as valid concern and
acknowledge that we all
need to do better in staying abreast of potentially rapidly changing
standards and new
information?
Those responding with self-righteous indignation
justify their limitations. No one of us can fully understand the
professional role of a colleague in a given specialty unless we have
practiced in that field. And no matter what the specialty, we all have
our challenges; some more than others. However, defensiveness crosses
all specialties and displaying oneself, or their specialty, as
"perfect", without the need for reproach or at least a bit of
introspection is impractical and reinforces any complacency which may
already exist: "How dare she say anything which might reflect poorly on us! Who does she think she is!" Ms. Slowick is a person with an opinion, just as those responding have their opinions and I have mine.
Ms.
Shellenberger states that she is "appalled" on behalf of herself and
her 300 school nurse colleagues? Appalled at what exactly? That someone
dared to question her specialty and the fact that some of the
practitioners in it may not have kept abreast with changing standards?
Perhaps Ms. Shellenberger should speak only for herself instead of
assuming that all of her colleagues appreciate her defensiveness and
thin-skin. Or on the other hand, wrongly assuming that all of her
colleagues are indeed up-to-date and flourishing in their specialty
only to detract from the nurses who DO spend the time and make the
commitment to to excel in their field.The true leaders and advocates
should be singled out and honored as the future for your specialty so
they can help their colleagues who wish to join them in excellence.
I found it disappointing that Ms. Shellienberger would make
sweeping statements to the effect that ALL 300 of her colleagues in the
Philadelphia school health specialty know what it takes to practice to
the highest standards of nursing. Just by odds and probabilities in any
specialty area, that assumption would most likely be wrong; just
inaccurate; perhaps not do-able. Ms. Shellenberger does not personally
know and evaluate all of her colleagues any more than I know and
evaluate all of mine. No one could realistically speak for 300
colleagues on an individual basis of competency.
I hope Ms.
Shellenberger can accept this as constructive criticism. While it's
true that we are all in this together, arguing for our limitations and
our defensiveness only reinforces them. This not only applies to school
health nurses; but to all of us as nurses.
There is a
difference between being supportive and having blind allegiance which
may serve to justify our shortcomings and defer opportunities for
improvement. Denying the truth does not change it; it just delays
reality.